基于CARE- Ⅱ的颈动脉轻度狭窄患者易损斑块分布研究

Distribution of vulnerable plaque in patients with mild carotid stenosis based on CARE- Ⅱ

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于中国动脉粥样硬化风险评估第Ⅱ期(CARE- Ⅱ)研究探讨不同性别、年龄颈动脉轻度狭窄患者易损斑块的分布差异,以期为该类人群进行分层管理提供依据。
    方法 回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年12月间CARE- Ⅱ研究数据库中双侧颈动脉狭窄率<50%的627例患者的临床资料,其中男性399例、女性228例,年龄(60.9±10.0)岁。采用MRI评估双侧颈动脉狭窄率<50%颈动脉粥样硬化斑块的特征。患者按照性别进行分组,根据北美症状性颈部动脉内膜切除试验法,计算颈动脉的平均管壁厚度、平均管壁面积、平均标准化管壁指数、管壁体积、管壁体积百分比、狭窄程度,并评估斑块相关的病理特征。对患者年龄进行分层(≤55岁、>55岁),分析颈动脉斑块特征的性别差异。2组间临床资料的比较采用t检验及χ2检验;2组间斑块特征的比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验及χ2检验;轻度狭窄的颈动脉易损斑块相关的临床及影像因素分析采用多因素Logistic回归分析。
    结果 男性组患者的身体质量指数(24.502.87) kg/m2对(23.693.52) kg/m2、舒张压(88.6314.68) mm Hg对(84.3610.81) mm Hg以及吸烟史比例(69.2%(276/399)对7.5%(17/288))均明显高于女性组,且差异均有统计学意义(t=−2.896、−4.163,χ2=222.008,均P<0.01);但年龄(59.999.89)岁对(62.559.87岁)、总胆固醇(4.481.09) mmol/L对(4.911.14) mmol/L及低密度脂蛋白(2.800.90) mmol/L对(3.151.06) mmol/L水平均低于女性组,且差异均有统计学意义(t=3.098、4.720、4.152,均P<0.01)。男性组患者颈动脉的平均管壁厚度1.10(0.96, 1.26) mm对1.00(0.88, 1.13) mm、平均管壁面积32.82(27.08, 37.62) mm2对26.66(22.38, 31.46) mm2及管壁体积1024.72(834.96, 1184.12) mm3对831.64(705.22, 959.57) mm3均高于女性组,差异均有统计学意义(Z=−6.009,−9.217,−8.847,均P<0.001);且斑块中更容易出现斑块内富含脂质的坏死核心、斑块内出血、薄纤维帽和美国心脏协会(AHA) Ⅵ型斑块,这种情况更多见于年龄>55岁的人群。Logistic多因素回归分析表明,年龄>55岁、狭窄程度及斑块负荷是美国心脏协会Ⅵ 型斑块的独立危险因素(95%CI:1.267~7.891、1.014~1.061、1.175~1.311,均P<0.05)。
    结论 在中国颈动脉轻度狭窄人群中,男性、高龄患者的颈动脉斑块负荷更大,易损斑块更多,可为该类人群的分层管理提供依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To investigate the variations in plaque distribution among individuals with mild carotid artery stenosis, with a focus on gender and age, utilizing data based on a Chinese Atherosclerosis Risk Evaluation Ⅱ (CARE- Ⅱ) study.
    Methods  The clinical data of 627 patients with carotid artery stenosis <50% in the CARE- Ⅱ study from January 2012 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, including 399 males and 228 females, aged 60.9±10.0 years. The features of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in individuals with bilateral carotid artery stenosis measuring less than 50% were measured using MRI. The patients were stratified into two cohorts based on gender. Following the protocols outlined in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, various metrics, including mean wall thickness, mean wall area, mean standardized wall index, wall volume, wall volume percentage, and degree of stenosis of the carotid artery, were computed, alongside the assessment of the pathological features of plaque. The patients were categorized on the basis of age (≤55 years and >55 years), and analysis was conducted to examine gender disparities in carotid plaque characteristics. The clinical data of male and female groups were analyzed using t-tests and χ2 tests, whereas the plaque characteristics were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests and χ2 tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between clinical and imaging factors and the presence of mild carotid artery vulnerable plaque.
    Results  The body mass index ((24.50±2.87) kg/m2 vs. (23.69±3.52) kg/m2), diastolic blood pressure ((88.63±14.68) mm Hg vs. (84.36±10.81) mm Hg), and the proportion of smoking (69.2% (276/399) vs. 7.5% (17/288)) in the male group were higher than those in the female group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=−2.896, −4.163, χ2=222.008, all P<0.01). Conversely, age ((59.99±9.89) years vs. (62.55±9.87) years), total cholesterol ((4.48±1.09) mmol/L vs. (4.91±1.14) mmol/L), and low-density lipoprotein ((2.80±0.90) mmol/L vs. (3.15±1.06) mmol/L) in the male group were lower than those in the female group (t=3.098, 4.720, 4.152, all P<0.01). The average wall thickness (1.10 (0.96, 1.26) mm vs. 1.00 (0.88, 1.13) mm), average wall area (32.82 (27.08, 37.62) mm2 vs. 26.66 (22.38, 31.46) mm2), and wall volume (1024.72 (834.96, 1184.12) mm3 vs. 831.64 (705.22, 959.57) mm3) in the male group were significantly higher than those in the female group, of which the differences were statistically significant (Z=−6.009, −9.217, −8.847, all P<0.001). In addition, the presence of lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, thin fibrous cap and American Heart Association (AHA) type-Ⅵ plaque was prevalent in people over the age of 55. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age over 55, the degree of stenosis, and plaque burden were independent risk factors for the formation of AHA type-Ⅵ plaque (95%CI: 1.267~7.891, 1.014~1.061, 1.175~1.311, all P<0.05).
    Conclusions  In the cohort of Chinese patients with mild carotid stenosis, male and older adults have higher carotid plaque burden and more vulnerable plaques, providing a basis for stratified management of this population.

     

/

返回文章
返回