滕月, 蒋冲, 丁重阳. 原发胃弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤与胃癌18F-FDG PET/CT影像特征及鉴别诊断的研究[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2024, 48(3): 185-191. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202306030-00408
引用本文: 滕月, 蒋冲, 丁重阳. 原发胃弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤与胃癌18F-FDG PET/CT影像特征及鉴别诊断的研究[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2024, 48(3): 185-191. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202306030-00408
Teng Yue, Jiang Chong, Ding Chongyang. Study on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and gastric cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2024, 48(3): 185-191. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202306030-00408
Citation: Teng Yue, Jiang Chong, Ding Chongyang. Study on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and gastric cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2024, 48(3): 185-191. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202306030-00408

原发胃弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤与胃癌18F-FDG PET/CT影像特征及鉴别诊断的研究

Study on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and gastric cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较原发胃弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(GDLBCL)与胃癌患者18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT显像的影像特征,评估18F-FDG PET/CT鉴别诊断GDLBCL与胃癌的价值。
    方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年12月于南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院就诊的经组织病理学检查分别确诊为原发GDLBCL的71 例患者(其中男性33例、女性38例,中位年龄62岁,年龄范围为25~90岁)和胃癌的50例患者(其中男性36例、女性14例,中位年龄67岁,年龄范围为26~93岁)的临床资料、影像资料和消化内镜资料。比较原发GDLBCL与胃癌患者CT中病灶的厚度和18F-FDG摄取分型、最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、病灶最大厚度(THKmax)及SUVmax与THKmax的比值(SUVmax/THKmax);比较消化内镜与18F-FDG PET/CT所示病灶的累及范围。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较病灶SUVmax、THKmax、SUVmax/THKmax的组间差异;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价定量指标鉴别诊断GDLBCL与胃癌的效能。
    结果 原发GDLBCL患者病灶分型为Ⅰ型的28例(28/71,39.4%)、Ⅱ型16例(16/71,22.5%)、Ⅲ型27例(27/71,38.0%);胃癌患者病灶分型为Ⅰ型的13例(13/50,26.0%)、Ⅱ型31例(31/50,62.0%)、Ⅲ型6例(6/50,12.0%)。原发GDLBCL患者病灶的SUVmax、THKmax、SUVmax/THKmax 均高于胃癌患者 16.8(11.2,23.8)对7.2(4.8,10.9)、2.2(1.6,3.6) cm 对1.9(1.5,2.3) cm、6.2(5.0,9.7)对3.7(2.4,6.7),且差异均有统计学意义(Z=−6.342、−2.093、−4.541,均P<0.05)。通过ROC曲线计算的鉴别诊断原发GDLBCL和胃癌的SUVmax、THKmax、SUVmax/THKmax的临界值分别为12.7(AUC为0.839、灵敏度为0.687、特异度为0.863,P<0.001)、3.6 cm(AUC为0.612、灵敏度为0.284、特异度为0.798,P<0.05)、4.14 (AUC为0.743、灵敏度为0.861、特异度为0.582,P<0.001)。4 例(4/35,11.4%)原发GDLBCL患者消化内镜所示的病灶范围小于18F-FDG PET/CT所示范围,3例(3/42,7.1%)胃癌患者的消化内镜未发现确切病灶但18F-FDG PET/CT可见肿瘤病灶。
    结论 18F-FDG PET/CT的影像表现分型可以辅助GDLBCL与胃癌的鉴别诊断,SUVmax=12.7 对二者的鉴别诊断具有较高的价值。18F-FDG PET/CT较消化内镜能够发现GDLBCL与胃癌患者更多的胃部病灶。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To compare the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging characteristics of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GDLBCL) and gastric cancer, evaluate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differential diagnosis of GDLBCL and gastric carcinoma.
    Methods  The clinical data, imaging data and digestive endoscopy data of 71 primary GDLBCL and 50 gastric cancer patients with histopathologically confirmed in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from January 2018 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with primary GDLBCL included 33 males and 38 females, aged 25–90 years, with a median age of 62 years. Patients with gastric cancer included 36 males and 14 females, aged 26–93 years, with a median age of 67 years. The features evaluated included lesion thickness of CT and PET/CT imaging type, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), maximum thickness of lesion (THKmax), and ratio of SUVmax to THKmax (SUVmax/THKmax) between patients with primary GDLBCL and gastric cancer, and lesions involvement scope shown by digestive endoscopy and 18F-FDG PET/CT were compared. Differences in SUVmax, THKmax, and SUVmax/THKmax between groups were calculated by Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative indicators in differential diagnosis of primary GDLBCL and gastric cancer.
    Results  Different 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging types were found in primary GDLBCL (type Ⅰ: 28 cases (28/71, 39.4%), type Ⅱ: 16 cases (16/71, 22.5%), and type Ⅲ: 27 cases (27/71, 38.0%)) and gastric cancer (type Ⅰ: 13 cases (13/50, 26.0%), type Ⅱ: 31 cases (31/50, 62.0%), and type Ⅲ: 6 cases (6/50, 12.0%)). The SUVmax, THKmax, and SUVmax/THKmax of primary GDLBCL lesions were higher than those of gastric cancer patients (16.8 (11.2, 23.8) vs.7.2 (4.8, 10.9), 2.2 (1.6, 3.6) cm vs.1.9 (1.5, 2.3) cm, 6.2 (5.0, 9.7) vs. 3.7 (2.4, 6.7)), and differences were statistically significant (Z=−6.342, −2.093, −4.541; all P<0.05). The ROC curve analysis results showed that the cut-off values of SUVmax, THKmax, and SUVmax/THKmax for differential diagnosis of primary GDLBCL and gastric cancer were 12.7 (area under curve(AUC): 0.839, sensitivity: 0.687, specificity: 0.863; P<0.001), 3.6 cm (AUC: 0.612, sensitivity: 0.284, specificity: 0.798; P<0.05), and 4.14 (AUC: 0.743, sensitivity: 0.861, specificity: 0.582; P<0.001). The lesion areas in the digestive endoscopy of four (4/35, 11.4%) patients with primary GDLBCL were smaller than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT and negative digestive endoscopy results in three (3/42, 7.1%) patients with gastric cancer, but the tumor lesions were visible on 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Conclusions  18F-FDG PET/CT imaging types could help in the differential diagnosis of GDLBCL and gastric carcinoma. SUVmax=12.7 as cut-off value has high value in differential diagnosis of GDLBCL and gastric cancer. 18F-FDG PET/CT could identify more gastric lesions with GDLBCL and gastric cancer patients than digestive endoscopy.

     

/

返回文章
返回