18F-FDG PET/CT联合改良国际预后指标(NCCN-IPI)对弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后评估的价值分析

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with an enhanced international prognostic index (NCCN-IPI) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨改良国际预后指标(NCCN-IPI)对治疗结束后18F-FDG PET/CT评价为阴性的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的预后分层价值。
    方法 回顾性分析2013年4月至2017年8月在苏州大学附属第一医院经过6~8周期R-CHOP类方案化疗后,并经18F-FDG PET/CT评价为阴性的60例DLBCL患者的临床资料,其中男性28例、女性32例,中位年龄51岁(16~81岁)。采用NCCN-IPI进行危险度分层,采用 Log-rank 检验比较各组间无进展生存(PFS)期和总生存(OS)期的差异。
    结果 所有患者2年PFS率为83.33%(50/60),2年OS率为96.67%(58/60)。根据NCCN-IPI评分,低危组占35.0%(21/60),低中危组占41.7%(25/60),中高危组占18.3%(11/60),高危组占5.0%(3/60)。低危组与其他组间PFS差异有统计学意义(P=0.0272、0.0143、<0.0001),高危组与其他组间OS差异有统计学意义(P=0.0098、0.0166、0.0045),余各组间PFS及OS差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
    结论 应用NCCN-IPI可以对治疗结束后18F-FDG PET/CT评价为阴性的DLBCL患者进行进一步的预后分层。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the prognostic stratification value of an enhanced international prognostic index (NCCN-IPI) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are negative at the end of treatment with positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT).
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients with DLBCL from April 2013 to August 2017 in the first affiliated hospital of Soochow university. There were 28 males and 32 females, with a median age of 51 years (16−81 years). Baseline characteristics were collected from all the patients who underwent six- to eight-cycle R-CHOP regimen chemotherapy and were negative by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The risk stratification was performed by NCCN-IPI, Log-rank test was used for comparison of the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups.
    Results The patients featured a median follow-up of 34 months (14–69 months). The two-year PFS and OS rates reached 83.33% (50/60) and 96.67% (58/60), respectively. On the basis of NCCN-IPI risk categorization, 35.0% (21/60), 41.7% (25/60), 18.3% (11/60) and 5.0% (3/60) patients belonged to the low-, low–intermediate-, high–intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in the PFS between the low-risk group and the other groups (P=0.0272, 0.0143, <0.0001) and in the OS between the high-risk group and the other groups (P=0.0098, 0.0166, 0.0045). The difference between the PFS and OS of other components showed no statistical significance (all P>0.05).
    Conclusion Further prognostic stratification can be performed by NCCN-IPI in patients with DLBCL who are negative at the end of treatment by PET/CT.

     

/

返回文章
返回