2018年—2022年杭州市放射工作人员职业性外照射个人剂量监测结果分析

Analysis of individual dose to radiation workers from occupational external exposure in Hangzhou during 2018-2022

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析2018年—2022年杭州市放射工作人员职业性外照射个人剂量监测的结果,以期为放射工作人员放射防护的科学管理提供参考。
    方法 采用分层随机整群抽样收集2018年至2022年杭州市88家医疗机构放射工作人员个人剂量监测的结果,分析不同职业类别、不同类别医疗机构、不同工龄放射工作人员的个人剂量。数据不符合正态分布的两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验,多组间两两比较采用Kruskal-Wallis单因素方差分析(k样本);计数资料的组间比较采用卡方检验。
    结果 本研究共纳入11 641人次放射工作人员个人剂量监测数据,结果显示年集体有效剂量为2.471人·Sv,人均年有效剂量为0.12(0.06, 0.23)mSv/a,其中个人年有效剂量低于1 mSv的为11 450人次,占比高达98.36%。放射工作人员人均年有效剂量在不同职业类别、医疗机构类型及工龄组间的差异均有统计学意义(H=428.922、472.782、108.037,均P<0.001)。在职业类别方面,从事放射诊断、放射治疗、核医学以及介入放射学的工作人员人均年有效剂量依次为0.12(0.06, 0.22)、0.18(0.10, 0.29)、0.19(0.10, 0.30)、0.09(0.05, 0.20)mSv/a。不同医疗机构类型中,省级、市级、县级、私营医疗机构放射工作人员的人均年有效剂量分别为0.16(0.08, 0.26)、0.10(0.06, 0.17)、0.11(0.05, 0.21)、0.14(0.07, 0.23)mSv/a。10≤工龄<20年、20≤工龄<30年、工龄≥30年工作人员的人均年有效剂量分别为0.11(0.06, 0.22)、0.15(0.07, 0.25)、0.14(0.07, 0.25)、0.15(0.06, 0.26)。
    结论 杭州市放射工作人员的人均年有效剂量处于较低水平,但介入放射学工作人员的个人剂量监测结果未能反映出真实水平,需加强规范佩戴方面的管理,同时在放射防护的管理方面应对放射工作人员进行精细化和差异化管理。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  Analyze the individual dose to radiation workers from occupational external exposure in Hangzhou from 2018 to 2022, in order to provide reference for the scientific management of radiation protection for radiation workers.
    Method The results of individual dose monitoring of radiation workers in 88 medical institutions in Hangzhou from 2018 to 2022 were collected using stratified random cluster sampling, and the individual doses of radiation workers in different occupational categories, medical institutions, and years of service were analyzed. The Mann Whitney U test is used for comparing data that does not follow a normal distribution between two groups, the Kruskal Wallis H test is used for comparing multiple groups, and the Kruskal Wallis one-way ANOVA (k samples) is used for pairwise comparisons between multiple groups; The comparison of count data between groups is conducted using chi square test.
    Result  This study included personal dose monitoring data from 11641 radiation workers. The results showed that the annual collective effective dose was 2.471 person · Sv, and the per capita annual effective dose was 0.12 (0.06, 0.23) mSv/a. Among them, 11450 people had an individual annual effective dose below 1 mSv, accounting for as much as 98.36%. This study showed that there were statistically significant differences in the average annual effective dose of radiation workers among different occupational categories, medical institution types, and work experience groups (H=428.922, P<0.001; H=472.782, P<0.001; H=108.037, P<0.001). In terms of occupational categories, the average annual effective dose for personnel engaged in radiation diagnosis, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, and interventional radiology is 0.12 (0.06, 0.22), 0.18 (0.10, 0.29), 0.19 (0.10, 0.30), and 0.09 (0.05, 0.20) mSv/a, respectively. Among different types of medical institutions, the per capita annual effective dose of radiation workers in provincial, municipal, county-level, and private medical institutions is 0.16 (0.08, 0.26), 0.10 (0.06, 0.17), 0.11 (0.05, 0.21), and 0.14 (0.07, 0.23) mSv/a, respectively. According to seniority grouping, the average annual effective dose for staff with 10≤seniority<20 years, 20≤seniority<30 years, and≥30 years is 0.11 (0.06, 0.22), 0.15 (0.07, 0.25), 0.14 (0.07, 0.25), and 0.15 (0.06, 0.26), respectively.
    Conculsion The annual effective dose per capita of radiation workers in Hangzhou is at a low level, but the individual dose of interventional radiology workers fail to reflect the real level. It is necessary to strengthen the management of standardized wearing, and carry out refined and differentiated management of radiation workers in terms of radiation protection management.

     

/

返回文章
返回