基于CT平扫的临床-放射组学列线图模型预测肺腺癌气腔播散:一项双中心、回顾性研究

Clinical-radiomic nomogram model based on CT plain scan for predicting spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma: a two-center retrospective study

  • 摘要:
    目的 开发1个基于CT平扫的临床-放射组学列线图模型,探讨其在肺腺癌气腔播散(STAS)预测中的价值,并在1个独立外部验证集中对模型进行泛化性验证。
    方法 采用回顾性队列研究,收集2018年10月至2023年6月在南方医科大学第八附属医院(中心Ⅰ)和南方医科大学顺德医院附属陈村医院(中心Ⅱ)经手术后组织病理学检查确诊为肺腺癌的患者。其中,来自中心Ⅰ的肺腺癌患者201例,男性98例、女性103例,年龄(63.9±11.0)岁;来自中心Ⅱ的肺腺癌患者183例,男性84例、女性99例,年龄(62.9±10.8)岁。采用完全随机分组法将来自中心Ⅰ的201例肺腺癌患者按照7∶3的比例分为训练集(n=140)及内部验证集(n=61);将来自中心Ⅱ的183例肺腺癌患者作为外部验证集。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归筛选放射组学特征,将特征筛选保留的非零系数特征用于回归模型拟合,组合成放射组学标签(Radscore),并构建放射组学模型。采用单因素及多因素logistic回归筛选出预测STAS的独立影响因素。采用logistic回归机器学习算法构建临床-放射组学联合模型,并绘制列线图,检验列线图模型在外部验证集中的泛化性。采用受试者工作特征曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)评估列线图模型的诊断效能;采用校准曲线验证列线图模型的预测概率与实际概率的一致性;采用决策曲线评估列线图模型的临床净获益。
    结果 单因素及多因素logistic回归分析结果表明,支气管充气征(OR=0.428,95%CI:0.256~0.716)、空泡征(OR=0.155,95%CI:0.060~0.399)、月牙征(OR=0.216,95%CI:0.079~0.595)和肿瘤实性成分占比(OR=13.080,95%CI:5.403~31.658)是预测肺腺癌STAS的独立影响因素(均P<0.05)。列线图模型在训练集、内部验证集及外部验证集中预测STAS的AUC分别为0.923 (95%CI:0.874~0.971)、0.922(95%CI:0.844~1.000)和0.843(95%CI:0.787~0.900),均P<0.05,列线图模型在预测肺腺癌STAS中的灵敏度较高。校准曲线结果显示,列线图模型的预测概率与实际概率的一致性良好;决策曲线结果显示,在阈值概率为0~0.8时,列线图模型具有较高的临床净获益。
    结论 基于CT平扫的临床-放射组学列线图模型可以准确评估肺腺癌STAS,模型在外部验证集中得到了令人满意的泛化性验证。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To develop a clinical-radiomic nomogram model based on CT plain scan, assess its value in predicting spread through air spaces (STAS) in lung adenocarcinoma, and validate its generalizability in an independent external validation set.
    Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with lung adenocarcinoma confirmed by postoperative histopathological examination between October 2018 and June 2023 were enrolled from the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Center Ⅰ) and Chencun Hospital, Affiliated to Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University (Center Ⅱ). The cohort included 201 patients (98 males and 103 females; age (63.9±11.0) years) from Center Ⅰ and 183 patients (84 males and 99 females; age (62.9±10.8) years) from Center Ⅱ. Using a completely randomized grouping method, the 201 patients from Center Ⅰ were divided into a training set (n=140) and an internal validation set (n=61) in a 7∶3 ratio. The 183 patients from Center Ⅱ served as the external validation set. Radiomic features were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Features retained with non-zero coefficients were used for regression model fitting, combined into a radiomic signature (Radscore), and a radiomic model was developed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent influencing factors for predicting STAS. A logistic regression machine learning algorithm was employed to construct a combined clinical-radiomic model, and a nomogram was plotted. The generalizability of the nomogram model was tested in the external validation set. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curves (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the nomogram model. Calibration curves were utilized to verify the agreement between the predicted probability and the actual probability. Decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical net benefit of the nomogram model.
    Results Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that air bronchogram sign (OR=0.428, 95%CI: 0.256–0.716), vacuole sign (OR=0.155, 95%CI: 0.060–0.399), crescent sign (OR=0.216, 95%CI: 0.079–0.595), and consolidation-to-tumor ratio (OR=13.080, 95%CI: 5.403–31.658) were independent influencing factors for predicting STAS in lung adenocarcinoma (all P<0.05). The AUCs of the nomogram model for predicting STAS were 0.923(95%CI: 0.874–0.971) in the training set, 0.922(95%CI: 0.844–1.000) in the internal validation set, and 0.843(95%CI: 0.787–0.900) in the external validation set (all P<0.05), demonstrating high sensitivity of the nomogram model in predicting STAS. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and actual probabilities. Decision curve analysis revealed that the nomogram model provided a high clinical net benefit within a threshold probability range of 0–0.8.
    Conclusions The clinical-radiomic nomogram model based on CT plain scan can accurately assess STAS in lung adenocarcinoma. The model demonstrated satisfactory validation of generalizability in the external validation set.

     

/

返回文章
返回