18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像在溶骨性病变鉴别诊断中的价值研究

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging in the differential diagnosis of osteolytic lesions

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT双时相显像代谢参数在溶骨性转移瘤与多发性骨髓瘤(MM)鉴别诊断中的应用价值。
    方法 回顾性分析2019年9月至2022年6月于赤峰市医院因溶骨性病变行18F-FDG PET/CT检查并最终经活体组织病理学检查或临床随访证实的50例溶骨性转移瘤患者其中男性29例、女性21例,年龄(56.8±12.8)岁,范围15~80岁和37例MM患者其中男性22例、女性15例,年龄(58.5±8.5)岁,范围37~77岁的影像资料。对二者分别行18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像,显像剂注射后50~60 min先进行常规(早期)显像,显像剂注射后110~120 min对代谢较高或较大病灶进行延迟显像。以患者为单位,测量溶骨性转移瘤患者原发灶及代谢最高的溶骨性转移灶的早期及延迟显像的最大标准摄取值(SUVmax);以病灶为单位,测量溶骨性转移瘤患者代谢较高的前3个溶骨性转移灶的早期及延迟显像的SUVmax。MM患者的测量方法与溶骨性转移瘤患者相同。计算溶骨性转移瘤和MM 患者的滞留指数(RI)。比较溶骨性转移瘤和MM 患者间代谢参数和病灶全身分布的差异。不符合正态分布的计量资料的组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;计数资料的组间比较采用卡方检验;采用ROC曲线分析评估早期SUVmax在鉴别溶骨性转移瘤与MM中的最佳临界值及诊断效能。对溶骨性转移瘤患者代谢最高的转移灶与原发灶的早期SUVmax行Spearman相关性分析。
    结果 以患者为单位,溶骨性转移瘤患者的早期SUVmax 10.85(8.60, 14.98)高于MM患者4.50(3.15, 6.10);以病灶为单位,溶骨性转移瘤患者病灶的早期SUVmax10.10(7.80, 12.80)亦高于MM患者3.50(2.45, 5.45);溶骨性转移瘤患者的RI 0.17(0.07, 0.36)高于MM患者−0.01(−0.17, 0.36),差异均有统计学意义(Z=−6.470、−11.247、−2.576,均P<0.05)。早期SUVmax鉴别溶骨性转移瘤与MM的最佳临界值为6.95,灵敏度为83.2%,特异度为87.2%,曲线下面积为0.926(95%CI:0.893~0.959,P<0.001)。溶骨性转移瘤患者转移灶与原发灶早期SUVmax之间呈中度正相关(r=0.66,P<0.001)。病灶全身分布的比较结果显示,MM比溶骨性转移瘤更易累及颅骨、颈椎、胸椎及肩锁骨,二者在这些部位的病灶累及率的差异均有统计学意义(χ2=3.999~6.842,均P<0.05)。
    结论 18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像代谢参数在溶骨性转移瘤与MM的鉴别诊断中有较好的应用价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the application value of metabolic parameters from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT dual-phase imaging in distinguishing between osteolytic metastases and multiple myeloma (MM).
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted to collect imaging data from 50 patients with osteolytic metastases (29 males, 21 females; mean age (56.8±12.8) years, range 15–80 years) and 37 patients with MM (22 males, 15 females; mean age (58.5±8.5) years, range 37–77 years) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations for osteolytic lesions at Chifeng Municipal Hospital from September 2019 to June 2022 and were ultimately confirmed by biopsy histopathological examination or clinical follow-up. 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging was performed, with routine (early-phase) imaging conducted 50–60 min after radiotracer injection and delayed-phase imaging of hypermetabolic or larger lesions occurring 110–120 min post-injection. In the patient-based analysis, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of both early-phase and delayed-phase imaging were measured for the primary lesion and the most metabolically active osteolytic metastatic lesion in the osteolytic metastases group. For lesion-based analysis, the SUVmax of both early-phase and delayed-phase imaging were measured for the three most metabolically active osteolytic metastatic lesions in the osteolytic metastases group. The same measurement methods were applied to the MM group. The retention index (RI) was calculated for both groups. Differences in metabolic parameters and distribution of lesions between the two groups were compared. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare measurement data that deviated from the normal distribution between groups. Counting data between groups was compared using the chi-squared test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to determine the optimal threshold for early-phase SUVmax to differentiate between osteolytic metastases and MM, and to evaluate diagnostic efficacy. Additionally, a Spearman correlation analysis was performed between the early-phase SUVmax of the most metabolically active metastatic lesion and that of the primary lesion in the osteolytic metastases group.
    Results In the patient-based analysis, the early-phase SUVmax in the osteolytic metastases group (10.85 (8.60, 14.98)) was significantly higher than that in the MM group (4.50 (3.15, 6.10)). Similarly, in the lesion-based analysis, the early-phase SUVmax for lesions in the osteolytic metastases group (10.10 (7.80, 12.80)) was higher than that in the MM group (3.50 (2.45, 5.45)). Additionally, the RI in the osteolytic metastases group (0.17 (0.07, 0.36)) was higher than that in the MM group (−0.01 (−0.17, 0.36)), with all differences being statistically significant (Z=−6.470, −11.247, −2.576; all P<0.05). The optimal threshold of early-phase SUVmax for distinguishing osteolytic metastases from MM was 6.95, with a sensitivity of 83.2%, specificity of 87.2%, and an area under the curve of 0.926 (95%CI: 0.893–0.959, P<0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between the early-phase SUVmax of the metastatic lesion and the primary lesion in the osteolytic metastases group (r=0.66, P<0.001). The distribution of lesions showed that MM was more commonly observed in the cranial bones, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, and clavicles, with statistically significant differences in involvement rates between the two groups (χ2=3.999–6.842; all P<0.05).
    Conclusion The metabolic parameters obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging offer good application value in distinguishing between osteolytic metastases and MM.

     

/

返回文章
返回