-
马蹄肾是最常见的先天性肾脏融合畸形[1]。对于马蹄肾和其他肾脏疾病的患者,需要准确评估其肾脏功能以制定合适的治疗方案。准确的肾小球滤过率(glomerular filtration rate,GFR)对于解释临床症状、确定给药剂量、检测和管理肾脏疾病以及评估预后至关重要[2]。GFR指单位时间内两侧肾脏产生的超滤液量,是评价肾脏功能的重要指标。99Tcm-DTPA肾动态显像法是测定GFR的理想方法,该方法也称为Gates法。然而,这种方法的准确性受到许多因素的影响,其中肾脏深度是最重要的一种。肾脏深度偏差可导致GFR估算错误,真实肾脏深度相差1 cm,可导致估算的成年人GFR产生14%~16%的偏差[3]。目前,临床常用肾脏深度估算公式来计算肾脏深度,如Tonnesen公式[4]、Taylor公式[5]、北京大学第一医院推荐公式[6]等,但上述公式均以正常成年人为研究对象所得。马蹄肾患者双肾解剖形态结构与正常肾脏不同,现有的公式是否适合计算马蹄肾患者的肾脏深度仍有待进一步研究。故本研究评估不同肾脏深度估算公式对马蹄肾患者的适用性。
-
由表1可知,不同估算公式计算的肾脏深度均小于CT实测肾脏深度,且差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。
表 1 不同估算公式计算的55例马蹄肾患者的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度的比较(
,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s$ Table 1. Comparison between renal-depths of 55 patients with horseshoe kidney calculated by different formulas and measured by CT (
, cm)$\bar{x} \pm s$ -
由图2可见,不同估算公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间存在显著的相关性(r=0.430~0.528,均P<0.001)。其中,北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的肾脏深度较Tonnesen公式和Taylor公式更准确。
-
采用 Bland-Altman 对公式计算肾脏深度与 CT 实测肾脏深度之间进行一致性分析,结果显示,所有公式均低估了肾脏深度,且公式计算肾脏深度与 CT 实测肾脏深度之间的差值随着肾脏深度的增加而增加,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)(表2、图2)。 由表2可知,Tonnesen公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度间偏倚最大[左肾:(2.38±1.24) cm、右肾:(2.69±1.30) cm]。由表2和图3可知,虽然Taylor公式与Tonnesen公式的相关系数较为接近,但Taylor公式的一致性更好[左肾:(1.76±1.29) cm;右肾:(1.70±1.32) cm];北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的偏倚较小[左肾:(1.14±1.22) cm、右肾:(1.46±1.27) cm]。
项目 分肾 个数(个) ±Sd(${{\overline d}} $ ,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s $ 95%的一致性界限( ,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s $ 95% 置信区间 P值 Tonnesen公式[4]与CT实测 左肾 55 2.38±1.24 2.38±2.43 2.039~2.718 <0.001 右肾 55 2.69±1.30 2.69±2.55 2.347~3.061 <0.001 Taylor公式[5]与CT实测 左肾 55 1.76±1.29 1.76±2.53 1.412~2.119 <0.001 右肾 55 1.70±1.32 1.70±2.59 1.349~2.073 <0.001 北京大学第一医院推荐公式[6]与CT实测 左肾 55 1.14±1.22 1.14±2.39 0.805~1.471 <0.001 右肾 55 1.46±1.27 1.46±2.49 1.118~1.813 <0.001 注:CT为计算机体层摄影术; ±Sd为估算公式计算肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的差值的均数±差值的标准差$ {{\overline d}}$ 表 2 不同估算公式计算的55例马蹄肾患者的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的Bland-Altman一致性分析
Table 2. Bland-Altman consistency analysis between formula calculated and CT measured renal-depths of 55 patients with horseshoe kidney
不同肾脏深度估算公式在马蹄肾患者肾动态显像中的实用性评价
Practical evaluation of different renal-depth estimation formulas in renal dynamic imaging for patients with horseshoe kidney
-
摘要:
目的 以CT实测肾脏深度为参考标准,探讨应用不同估算公式计算马蹄肾患者肾脏深度的准确性。 方法 回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年12月于重庆医科大学附属第一医院行99Tcm-二亚乙基三胺五乙酸肾动态显像检查的55例马蹄肾患者的临床资料,其中男性33例、女性22例,年龄19~80(42.2±16.3)岁。分别选取双肾肾门最远点和最近点与皮肤的垂直距离,取其平均值作为CT实测肾脏深度。记录患者的性别、年龄、身高和体重。分别采用Tonnesen公式、Taylor公式、北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算肾脏深度。并在公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间进行配对样本t检验、Pearson相关性分析和Bland-Altman一致性分析。 结果 在55例患者中,Tonnesen公式、Taylor公式、北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的肾脏深度均小于CT实测肾脏深度,且差异均有统计学意义(左肾:t=−14.04~−6.85,均P<0.01;右肾:t=−15.19~−8.47,均P<0.01)。公式计算与CT实测肾脏深度之间存在显著的相关性(r=0.430~0.528,均P<0.001),与Tonnesen公式和Taylor公式相比,北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的相关性更好(左肾:r=0.528、右肾:r=0.484,均P<0.001)。所有公式均低估了肾脏深度,估算误差随着肾脏深度的增加而增加,且差异均有统计学意义[95%置信区间:(0.805~1.471)~(2.347~3.061),均P<0.001]。Tonnesen公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度间偏倚最大[左肾:(2.38±1.24) cm,右肾:(2.69±1.30) cm]。虽然Taylor公式与Tonnesen公式的相关系数较为接近,但Taylor公式的一致性更好[左肾:(1.76±1.29) cm,右肾:(1.70±1.32) cm]。北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的偏倚较小[左肾:(1.14±1.22) cm、右肾:(1.46±1.27) cm]。 结论 采用Tonnesen公式、Taylor公式、北京大学第一医院推荐公式计算的马蹄肾患者肾脏深度的准确性均不如CT实测,准确评估马蹄肾患者肾小球滤过率建议采用CT实测的肾脏深度。 -
关键词:
- 融合肾 /
- 肾小球滤过率 /
- 肾脏深度 /
- 肾动态显像 /
- 体层摄影术,X线计算机
Abstract:Objective To validate the accuracy of different estimation formulas for measuring renal depth in patients with horseshoe kidney using CT actual measured renal-depth as a reference standard. Methods The clinical data of 55 patients with horseshoe kidney who underwent 99Tcm-diethylene-triaminepentaacetic acid renal dynamic imaging in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2015 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients included 33 males and 22 females aged 19–80 (42.2±16.3) years. The vertical distance between the farthest and nearest points of the renal hilum and the skin of both kidneys were selected respectively, and the average value was taken as the renal-depth. The gender, age, height, and weight of the patients were recorded. The estimated renal-depths were obtained using the Tonnesen, Taylor, and Li Qian formulas, respectively. Paired t test, Pearson correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed between the estimated and CT measured renal-depths. Results In 55 patients, the renal-depths calculated by the Tonnesen, Taylor, and Li Qian formulas were all lower than the CT measured renal-depths, and the differences were all statistically significant (left kidney: t=−14.04 to −6.85, all P<0.01; right kidney: t=−15.19 to −8.47, all P<0.01). A significant correlation existed between formulas estimated and CT measured renal-depths (r=0.430−0.528, all P<0.001), but the Li Qian formula correlated better than the Tonnesen and Taylor formula, where the correlation coefficient was (r=0.528, P<0.001) for the left kidney and (r=0.484, P<0.001) for the right kidney. All formulas underestimated the renal-depth; the estimated error increased with increased renal-depth, and the difference was statistically significant (95%CI: (0.805–1.471) to (2.347–3.061), all P<0.001). The bias between the renal-depths estimated by the Tonnesen formula and those measured by CT was the largest (left kidney: (2.38±1.24) cm; right kidney: (2.69±1.30) cm). Although the correlation coefficients of the Taylor and Tonnesen formulas were closer, the Taylor formula had better agreement, with biases of (1.76±1.29) cm and (1.70±1.32) cm for the left and right kidneys, respectively. The bias between the renal-depths derived from the Li Qian formula and those measured by CT was smaller (left kidney: (1.14±1.22) cm; right kidney: (1.46±1.27) cm). Conclusions The accuracy of renal-depth in patients with horseshoe kidney calculated using Tonnesen, Taylor, and Li Qian formulas were not as good as the actual CT measurement. Therefore, to accurately assess glomerular filtration rate, CT is recommended to measure the renal-depth of patients with horseshoe kidney. -
表 1 不同估算公式计算的55例马蹄肾患者的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度的比较(
,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s$ Table 1. Comparison between renal-depths of 55 patients with horseshoe kidney calculated by different formulas and measured by CT (
, cm)$\bar{x} \pm s$ 表 2 不同估算公式计算的55例马蹄肾患者的肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的Bland-Altman一致性分析
Table 2. Bland-Altman consistency analysis between formula calculated and CT measured renal-depths of 55 patients with horseshoe kidney
项目 分肾 个数(个) ±Sd(${{\overline d}} $ ,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s $ 95%的一致性界限( ,cm)$\bar{x} \pm s $ 95% 置信区间 P值 Tonnesen公式[4]与CT实测 左肾 55 2.38±1.24 2.38±2.43 2.039~2.718 <0.001 右肾 55 2.69±1.30 2.69±2.55 2.347~3.061 <0.001 Taylor公式[5]与CT实测 左肾 55 1.76±1.29 1.76±2.53 1.412~2.119 <0.001 右肾 55 1.70±1.32 1.70±2.59 1.349~2.073 <0.001 北京大学第一医院推荐公式[6]与CT实测 左肾 55 1.14±1.22 1.14±2.39 0.805~1.471 <0.001 右肾 55 1.46±1.27 1.46±2.49 1.118~1.813 <0.001 注:CT为计算机体层摄影术; ±Sd为估算公式计算肾脏深度与CT实测肾脏深度之间的差值的均数±差值的标准差$ {{\overline d}}$ -
[1] Pawar AS, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, et al. Incidence and characteristics of kidney stones in patients with horseshoe kidney: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Urol Ann, 2018, 10(1): 87−93. DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_76_17. [2] Miller WG, Jones GRD. Estimated glomerular filtration rate; laboratory implementation and current global status[J]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis, 2018, 25(1): 7−13. DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2017.09.013. [3] 李乾, 张春丽, 王荣福. 肾动态显像测定肾小球滤过率的影响因素[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2004, 20(6): 962−964. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2004.06.046.
Li Q, Zhang CL, Wang RF. Influence elements in the process of dynamic renal imaging to measure glomerular filtration rate[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2004, 20(6): 962−964. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2004.06.046.[4] Tønnesen KH, Mogensen P, Wolf H, et al. Residual kidney function after unilateral nephrectomy. Pre- and postoperative estimation by renography and clearance measurements[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 1976, 10(2): 130−133. DOI: 10.3109/00365597609179672. [5] Taylor A, Lewis C, Giacometti A, et al. Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults[J]. J Nucl Med, 1993, 34(10): 1766−1769. [6] 李乾, 张春丽, 付占立, 等. 肾动态显像法计算中国人肾脏深度[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2007, 23(2): 288−291. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2007.02.037.
Li Q, Zhang CL, Fu ZL, et al. Measuring kidney depth of Chinese people with kidney dynamic imaging[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2007, 23(2): 288−291. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2007.02.037.[7] Sriperumbuduri S, Dent R, Malcolm J, et al. Accurate GFR in obesity —protocol for a systematic review[J/OL]. Syst Rev, 2019, 8(1): 147[2021-05-04]. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-019-1052-2. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1052-2. [8] 龚珂, 秦东芳, 王学晶. 肾小球滤过率测量方法的研究进展[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2020, 43(4): 502−506. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20190514-00293.
Gong K, Qin DF, Wang XJ. Research progress in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate[J]. Chin J Lab Med, 2020, 43(4): 502−506. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20190514-00293.[9] Levey AS, Coresh J, Tighiouart H, et al. Measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate: current status and future directions[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2020, 16(1): 51−64. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-019-0191-y. [10] Yong ZZ, Li F, Pei XH, et al. A comparison between 2017 FAS and 2012 CKD-EPI equations: a multi-center validation study in Chinese adult population[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2019, 51(1): 139−146. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1997-4. [11] Mititelu R, Bratu O. Radionuclide imaging. An update on the use of dynamic renal scintigraphy[J]. Mod Med, 2017, 24(4): 199−203. DOI: 10.31689/rmm.2017.24.4.199. [12] Blaufox MD, De Palma D, Taylor A, et al. The SNMMI and EANM practice guideline for renal scintigraphy in adults[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2018, 45(12): 2218−2228. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4129-6. [13] Volterrani D, Orsini F, Guidoccio F. Radionuclide imaging of the nephro-urinary tract[M]//Volterrani D, Erba PA, Carrió I, et al. Nuclear medicine textbook: methodology and clinical applications. Cham: Springer, 2019: 785−808. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95564-3_30. [14] Sugawara S, Ishii S, Kojima Y, et al. Feasibility of gamma camera-based GFR measurement using renal depth evaluated by lateral scan of 99mTc-DTPA renography[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2020, 34(5): 349−357. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-020-01455-w. [15] Cosenza NN, Lau F, Lima MCL, et al. Influence of bladder fullness on the detection of urinary tract obstruction by dynamic renal scintigraphy[J]. Radiol Bras, 2017, 50(4): 237−243. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2016-0061. [16] 陆素青, 卢彦祺, 付巍. 放射性核素肾动态显像弹丸注射方法的应用研究进展[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2020, 44(10): 667−671. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202004018-00085.
Lu SQ, Lu YQ, Fu W. Application study of pellet injection method of nuclide kidney dynamic imaging[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2020, 44(10): 667−671. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202004018-00085.[17] 韩萍萍, 李玲, 刘杰, 等. 肾脏深度对肾动态显像测定肾小球滤过率的影响[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2017, 32(6): 66−69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2017.06.017.
Han PP, Li L, Liu J, et al. Effect of kidney depth in glomerular filtration rate measured by kidney dynamic imaging[J]. China Med Devices, 2017, 32(6): 66−69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2017.06.017.[18] 陈曙光, 石洪成, 胡鹏程. Tonnesen公式计算肾脏深度的准确性与BMI的关系[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2012, 32(6): 430−433. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2012.06.007.
Chen SG, Shi HC, Hu PC. Accuracy of the Tonnesen formula and its relationship with body mass index[J]. Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2012, 32(6): 430−433. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2012.06.007.[19] Nautiyal A, Mukherjee A, Mitra D, et al. Impact of body mass index on Gates method of glomerular filtration rate estimation: a comparative study with single plasma sample method[J]. Indian J Nucl Med, 2019, 34(1): 19−23. DOI: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_112_18. [20] 麻广宇, 邵明哲, 陈云爽, 等. 肾脏深度对SPECT测定肾小球滤过率的影响[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2013, 29(5): 800−804. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2013.05.034.
Ma GY, Shao MZ, Chen YS, et al. Impact of kidney depth on the measurement of glomerular filtration rate with SPECT[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2013, 29(5): 800−804. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2013.05.034.[21] 张智, 张更, 王志勇, 等. 马蹄肾的并发症及治疗研究进展[J]. 人民军医, 2018, 61(3): 271−273, 277.
Zhang Z, Zhang G, Wang ZY, et al. Research progress on complications and treatment of horseshoe kidney[J]. People Mil Surg, 2018, 61(3): 271−273, 277.[22] Balawender K, Cisek A, Cisek E, et al. Anatomical and clinical aspects of horseshoe kidney: a review of the current literature[J]. Int J Morphol, 2019, 37(1): 12−16. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022019000100012. [23] Kang M, Kim YC, Lee H, et al. Renal outcomes in adult patients with horseshoe kidney[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2021, 36(3): 498−503. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz217. [24] Qi Y, Hu PP, Xie YS, et al. Glomerular filtration rate measured by 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging is significantly lower than that estimated by the CKD-EPI equation in horseshoe kidney patients[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2016, 21(6): 499−505. DOI: 10.1111/nep.12663.