前列腺癌容积旋转调强放疗中标志物可探测性研究

Research on detectability of markers in volume-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer

  • 摘要:
    目的 量化前列腺癌容积旋转调强放疗中植入标志物的可探测性,寻找最佳植入位置。
    方法 (1)依次将标志物植入4种模式下盆腔假体内不同既定坐标组合处。(2)调取25例既往前列腺癌患者的容积旋转调强放疗计划,对每次按照实验设计植入了标志物的盆腔假体分别进行25次照射,单次剂量约为60 Gy,在每个控制点获取兆伏级电子射野影像平片。(3)利用兆伏级平片和自研算法计算每种坐标组合25次照射的可探测性分数的均值(\overlineD),并寻找最佳植入位置。通过曲线拟合分析计算普适情况下最佳植入位置参数值a和b。
    结果 组级结果:在所有组级坐标组合中,B模式下B10-Ⅰ组(10,3,0)、(−10,3,0)、(10,−3,0)、(−10,−3,0),单位:mm的\overlineD最高(0.2652分)。模式级结果:在所有模式中,D模式(0,3b,0)、(a,b,a)、(−a,−b,−a)、(0,−3b,0),a、b均为参数,单位:mm下的\overlineD的平均值最高(0.2489分)。系统化结果:当a=9.6 mm、b=4.6 mm时,4种模式下所有坐标组合的\overlineD均较为理想。
    结论 成功量化了植入标志物的可探测性并获取了由组级到模式级再到系统化的最佳植入位置。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To quantify the detectability of implanted markers in volume-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer and to identify the best implant location.
    Methods (1) Markers were implanted with different fixed coordinate combinations in pelvic prostheses in proper order under four modes. (2) Twenty-five past volume-modulated arc therapy plans for prostate cancer were selected. In accordance with the experimental design, the pelvic prostheses implanted with the markers were irradiated for 25 times with single dose of about 60 Gy, and MV-level electronic portal image device images were obtained at each control point. (3) The mean value of detectability score ( \overlineD) of the implanted markers in each coordinate combination after 25 times of irradiation was calculated for every time point by using MV-level images and a self-developed algorithm to identify the best implant location. The optimal implant location parameters a and b were calculated via curve-fitting analysis.
    Results Group-level results: Among all group-level coordinate combinations, the \overlineD of group B10-Ⅰ ((10.0,3.0,0), (−10.0,3.0,0), (10.0,−3.0,0), (−10.0,−3.0,0); unit: mm) under mode B was the highest (0.2652). Mode-level results: Among all modes, the mean \overlineD of mode D ((0,3b,0), (a,b,a), (−a,b,−a), (0,−3b,0); a and b are parameters, unit: mm) was the highest (0.2489). System-level results: The \overlineD of all combinations under the four modes were ideal when a=9.6 mm and b=4.6 mm.
    Conclusion This study successfully quantified the detectability of implanted markers, and the best implant location from the group level to the model level and then to the system level was obtained.

     

/

返回文章
返回