内镜下钛夹植入对局部晚期食管癌术前放疗患者靶区勾画和剂量学参数的影响

Effect of endoscopic titanium clip labeling on target delineation and dosimetric parameters in preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨内镜下钛夹植入对局部晚期食管癌术前放疗患者靶区勾画和剂量学参数的影响。
    方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年12月于联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院经超声胃镜及组织病理学检查确诊为局部晚期食管鳞癌的36例患者的临床资料,其中男性23例、女性13例,年龄18~65(43.7±6.9)岁。放疗前所有患者均在内镜下分别于食管病灶的上界和下界行钛夹植入术,在钛夹植入前后均行CT扫描定位和靶区勾画,比较钛夹植入前后的大体肿瘤体积(GTV)长度、GTV、肿瘤临床体积(CTV)和危及器官受照剂量的差异。将36例患者按照GTV上界和下界的误差分为精确组(误差<1 cm)和误差组(误差≥1 cm),分析影响食管靶区勾画的因素。计量资料的比较采用配对样本t检验和独立样本t检验;采用χ2检验对精确组和误差组的临床病理特征进行单因素Logistic回归分析;采用Cox多因素回归模型分析影响靶区精确勾画的危险因素。
    结果 36例患者均顺利在内镜下植入钛夹,4例(11.1%)出现上界钛夹脱落;术后病理完全缓解率为52.8%(19/36)。钛夹植入前患者GTV长度为(4.74±1.02) cm,大于钛夹植入后的(3.98±0.79) cm,二者的差异有统计学意义(t=9.472,P<0.05)。钛夹植入前患者的GTV和CTV分别为(28.87±3.21) cm3和(72.46±6.37) cm3,均大于钛夹植入后的(24.59±2.67) cm3和(56.37±4.52) cm3,且差异均有统计学意义(t=6.726、7.696,均P<0.05)。钛夹植入前的双肺V10、V20(接受10、20 Gy照射剂量的肺体积占全肺总体积的百分比)和脊髓的受照剂量均高于钛夹植入后(21.64±1.57)%对(17.32±0.96)%、(14.87±2.32)%对(11.69±1.84)%、(28.87±3.21) Gy对(24.59±2.67) Gy,且差异均有统计学意义(t=8.05、7.64、−2.43,均P<0.01)。单因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、肿瘤位置、饮酒史、GTV长度与GTV的勾画精确度存在相关性(χ2=5.64、11.57、13.33、8.23,均P<0.01)。Cox多因素回归分析结果显示,肿瘤位置 相对危险度(RR)=0.296,95%置信区间:0.137~0.586,P<0.001和GTV长度(RR=2.313,95%置信区间:1.280~4.875,P<0.01)是影响GTV精确勾画的独立危险因素。
    结论 内镜下钛夹植入在局部晚期食管癌术前放疗中具有重要价值,可精确引导CT定位下靶区勾画的范围并减少正常器官的受照剂量。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the effects of titanium clip implantation under endoscope on target delineation and dosimetric parameters in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative radiotherapy.
    Methods The clinical data of 36 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma confirmed by ultrasound gastroscopy and histopathology in the Joint Logistics Support Force Hospital 900 from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 23 males and 13 females, aged 18−65(43.7±6.9) years. All patients were treated with titanium clip implantation at the upper and lower boundaries of esophageal lesions under endoscopy before and after radiotherapy. CT scan localization and target delineation were performed before and after titanium clip implantation. Gross tumor volume (GTV) length, GTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and normal organ irradiation dose were compared before and after titanium clip implantation. The patients were divided into accurate group (error < 1 cm) and error group (error≥1 cm) according to the error value, and the influencing factors of esophageal target delineation were analyzed. Paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test were used to compare the error values of tumor length, diameter, upper bound and lower bound before and after titanium clip implantation, spinal cord, and heart as well as the difference of the average irradiation dose of double lung V10 and V20. χ2 test was used to analyze the clinical case characteristics of the accurate group and the error group by univariate logistic regression. Cox multivariate regression risk factor analysis was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the accurate delineation of the target area.
    Results Titanium clips were successfully placed under endoscope in all patients, but 4 cases (11.1%) had the upper boundary titanium clips falling off. The postoperative pathological complete response rate was 52.8% (19/36). The length of GTV before titanium clip implantation was (4.74±1.02) cm, which was higher than that after implantation (3.98±0.79) cm, and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.472, P<0.05). The GTV and CTV of the tumor before implantation were (28.87±3.21) cm3 and (72.46±6.37) cm3, respectively, which were higher than (24.59±2.67) cm3 and (56.37±4.52) cm3 after implantation. The differences were statistically significant (t=6.726, 7.696; both P<0.05). The irradiation doses of V10, V20 (the percentage of lung volume in total lung volume that received more than 10 Gy and 20 Gy irradiation dose, respectively), and spinal cord in both lungs before titanium clip implantation were higher than those after implantation ((21.64±1.57)% vs. (17.32±0.96)%, (14.87±2.32)% vs. (11.69±1.84)%, (28.87±3.21) Gy vs. (24.59±2.67) Gy), and the differences were statistically significant (t=8.05, 7.64, −2.43; all P<0.01). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age, tumor location, drinking history, and GTV length were correlated with the accurate delineation of GTV (χ2=5.64, 11.57, 13.33, 8.23; all P<0.01). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor location and GTV length were independent risk factors affecting the accurate delineation of GTV (RR=0.296, 95%CI: 0.137~0.586; 2.313, 95%CI: 1.280~4.875; both P<0.01).
    Conclusions Endoscopic titanium clip implantation is of great value in preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. It can accurately guide the delineation of the target area under CT localization and reduce the irradiation dose of normal organs.

     

/

返回文章
返回