18F-FDG双时相及18F-FDG联合11C-CHO PET/CT多模态显像在原发性肝细胞肝癌中的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG dual-phase and 18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO PET/CT multimodality imaging in primary hepatocellular carcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT双时相显像及18F-FDG联合11C-胆碱(CHO) PET/CT多模态显像对原发性肝细胞肝癌(HCC)的诊断价值。
    方法 回顾性分析2016年3月至2018年12月于内蒙古医科大学附属医院就诊的临床疑似原发肝占位性病变的73例患者的临床资料,其中男性41例、女性32例,年龄58~72岁;47例患者行18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像,26例患者行18F-FDG联合11C-CHO PET/CT多模态显像。分别测量并计算每个病变的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、肝本底SUVmax、肿瘤SUVmax/肝本底SUVmax比值(T/L)。以病变良恶性为状态变量,分别以18F-FDG、18F-FDG延迟、18F-FDG双时相的SUVmax18F-FDG、11C-CHO、18F-FDG联合11C-CHO的SUVmax为检验变量绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线并进行两两比较,以组织病理学检查或临床随访结果为“金标准”,对比分析各种显像方法的诊断效能。计量资料的比较采用配对t检验;采用Z秩和检验比较各组间ROC曲线的差异。
    结果 (1)18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像:47例患者共检出49个病变(其中32个为高代谢病变),经组织病理学检查或临床随访结果证实,40个为HCC(高分化8个、中低分化32个),9个为良性病变。中低分化HCC的病变SUVmax、肝本底SUVmax和T/L的差异均有统计学意义(t=4.51、−2.53、4.80,均P<0.05);高分化HCC的病变SUVmax和T/L的差异均有统计学意义(t=2.76、2.62,均P<0.05);良性病变SUVmax的差异无统计学意义(t=0.00,P>0.05)。18F-FDG PET/CT显像分别与其延迟显像、双时相显像的SUVmax的ROC曲线间的差异均有统计学意义(Z=2.315、2.376,均P<0.05);而延迟显像与双时相显像的SUVmax的ROC曲线间的差异无统计学意义(Z=0.252,P>0.05)。(2) 18F-FDG联合11C-CHO PET/CT显像:26例患者共检出26个病变(其中18个为高代谢病变),经组织病理学检查或临床随访证实,22个为HCC(高分化9个、中低分化13个),4个为良性病变。高分化HCC的病变SUVmax、肝本底SUVmax间的差异均有统计学意义(t=9.49、6.57,均P<0.001),而T/L的差异无统计学意义(t=2.01,P>0.05);中低分化HCC的病变SUVmax的差异无统计学意义(t=−1.68,P>0.05),肝本底SUVmax、T/L间的差异均有统计学意义(t=8.41、−5.43,均P<0.001);良性病变的SUVmax的差异无统计学意义(t=1.51,P>0.05)。18F-FDG 与其联合11C-CHO PET/CT的SUVmax的 ROC曲线间的差异有统计学意义(Z=2.037,P<0.05)。
    结论 18F-FDG PET/CT双时相显像及18F-FDG联合11C-CHO PET/CT多模态显像可分别提高中低及高分化原发性HCC的检出率,对肝癌患者治疗方案的决策及临床预后判定有重要的指导价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT dual-phase and 18F-FDG combined with 11C-choline (CHO) PET/CT multimodal imaging in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    Methods Retrospective PET/CT analysis was conducted on 73 patients (41 males, 32 females; age range: 58–72 years) in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from March 2016 to December 2018. The patients had not been confirmed with primary hepatic space-occupying lesions, 47 patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging, and 26 patients underwent 18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO PET/CT multimodal imaging. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each lesion, the liver background, and the tumor SUVmax /liver background SUVmax (T/L) value of each lesion were measured. Positive or negative lesions were adopted as state variables, and SUVmax (18F-FDG, 18F-FDG delay, and 18F-FDG dual phase) and SUVmax (18F-FDG, 11C-CHO, and 18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO) were used as test variables. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was compared in pairs, and the histopathological examination or clinical follow-up results were used as the gold standard. The diagnostic efficacy of various imaging methods was compared and analyzed. The measurement data were compared through a paired t test, and the Z-rank test was used to compare the differences in the ROC curves of the groups.
    Results (1) 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging: a total of 49 lesions were detected in 47 patients (32 of them were hypermetabolic lesions). Histopathological examination or clinical follow-ups confirmed that 9 lesions were benign and 40 were HCC (8 of them were well-differentiated and 32 were moderately-poorly differentiated). The SUVmax differences in the lesion, liver background, and T/L values of the moderately-poorly differentiated HCC were statistically significant (t=4.51, −2.53, 4.80; all P<0.05). The SUVmax differences in the lesion and T/L values of well-differentiated HCC were statistically significant (t=2.76, 2.62; both P<0.05), but no statistical difference was observed in the SUVmax value of the benign lesions (t=0.00, P>0.05). The ROC curve differences 18F-FDG SUVmax and delayed imaging, dual-phase imaging were statistically significant (Z=2.315, 2.376; both P<0.05), however, the ROC curve differences of SUVmax between delayed imaging and dual-imaging wasn't statistically significant (Z=0.252, P>0.05 ). (2) 18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO imaging: a total of 26 lesions were detected in 26 patients (18 of them were hypermetabolic lesions). Histopathological examination or clinical follow-ups confirmed that 22 lesions were HCC (of which 9 lesions were well-differentiated and 13 lesions were moderately-poorly differentiated), and 4 lesions were benign. The SUVmax differences in the lesion and liver background values of well-differentiated HCC were statistically significant (t=9.49, 6.57; both P<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was observed in T/L value (t=2.01, P>0.05). The SUVmax difference in the lesion value of moderately-poorly differentiated HCC was not statistically significant (t=−1.68, P>0.05), but the SUVmax differences in liver background and T/L value were statistically significant (t=8.41, −5.43; both P<0.001). No statistical difference was also noted in the SUVmax of benign lesions (t=1.51, P>0.05). The difference in ROC curve between SUVmax (18F-FDG) and SUVmax (18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO) was statistically significant (Z=2.037, P<0.05).
    Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging and 18F-FDG combined with 11C-CHO PET/CT multimodal imaging can improve the detection rate of moderately-poorly and well-differentiated primary HCC and have an important guiding value in decision-making and clinical prognosis for patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回