Li Hesong, Zhao Xiaoyi, Yang Jiaqi, Xi Yongchang, Song Huimin, Tang Man, Ge Jianing. Predictive value of dual-phase 131I WBS in salivary gland dysfunction in patients with DTC treated with 131I after surgery[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2025, 49(6): 337-344. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202404023-00543
Citation: Li Hesong, Zhao Xiaoyi, Yang Jiaqi, Xi Yongchang, Song Huimin, Tang Man, Ge Jianing. Predictive value of dual-phase 131I WBS in salivary gland dysfunction in patients with DTC treated with 131I after surgery[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2025, 49(6): 337-344. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202404023-00543

Predictive value of dual-phase 131I WBS in salivary gland dysfunction in patients with DTC treated with 131I after surgery

  • Objective To investigate the relationship between the 131I decay metabolic rate (DMR) of salivary gland and salivary gland dysfunction, and to evaluate the predictive value of dual-phase 131I whole body scan (WBS) in salivary gland dysfunction in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) treated with 131I after surgery.
    Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 postoperative patients with DTC (including 19 males and 41 females, aged 45.6±12.6 years) and without salivary gland symptoms who received their first 131I treatment at Baoding NO.1 Central Hospital from May 2020 to May 2023. All patients underwent salivary gland scintigraphy (SGS) before treatment and completed the multidisciplinary salivary gland society Q3 (MSGS-Q3) survey questionnaire. The patients discontinued levothyroxine sodium tablets for 3 weeks and adhered to a low-iodine diet. When thyroid-stimulating hormone levels exceeded 30 mU/L, the patients received 131I ablation treatment (hereinafter referred to as the first treatment). 131I WBS was performed within the same time interval on the second and fourth days of treatment. All patients underwent 131I treatment for recurrent and metastatic lesions or adjuvant treatment (hereinafter referred to as the second treatment) after 3–6 months. Two months after the first treatment, the MSGS-Q3 was completed. The patients were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on the presence of salivary gland symptoms (a MSGS-Q3 score >5.00 was considered indicative of salivary gland symptoms). The 131I DMR of salivary gland was calculated by delineating regions of interest on two consecutive 131I WBS images and recording the radiation counts for bilateral salivary glands. Two months after the second treatment, the MSGS-Q3 was completed again, and the patients in the first asymptomatic group were further divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups based on the presence of salivary gland symptoms. Inter-group comparison of 131I DMR of salivary gland was performed using the Mann-Whitney U rank sum test. The sensitivity and specificity of 131I DMR of parotid and submandibular glands after the first treatment were assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for predicting salivary gland dysfunction in DTC patients treated with 131I after surgery, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated. The correlation between the 131I DMR of parotid and submandibular glands after the first treatment and MSGS-Q3 score after the first treatment was assessed through Spearman correlation analysis.
    Results SGS confirmed normal salivary gland uptake and excretion functions before treatment. The MSGS-Q3 score before treatment was 0 (0, 0.75) points, and all scores were ≤5.00 points. Differences in the 131I DMR of parotid glands (84.0%±9.8% vs. 91.2%(86.2%, 94.8%), Z=−2.113, P=0.034) and submandibular glands (77.5%±10.7% vs. 87.7%(83.1%, 91.0%), Z=−3.049, P=0.002) were statistically significant between the symptomatic (n=18) and asymptomatic groups (n=42) in the first treatment. The ROC AUC of the 131I DMR of parotid and submandibular glands after the first treatment were 0.673(95%CI: 0.523–0.823) and 0.750(95%CI: 0.601–0.899), respectively. When the optimal cutoff values of the 131I DMR of parotid and submandibular glands were 84.9% and 77.9%, respectively, sensitivity and specificity for predicting salivary gland dysfunction in patients with DTC treated with 131I after surgery were respectively 81.0% and 44.4% (parotid gland) and 83.3% and 61.1% (submandibular gland). However, no statistically significant differences (Z=0.984, 0.249; both P>0.05) in the 131I DMR of parotid and submandibular glands after the first treatment were observed between the symptomatic (n=14) and asymptomatic groups (n=28) after the second treatment. After the first treatment, the 131I DMR of parotid gland (R1=−0.358, P1=0.013), and the 131I DMR of submandibular gland (R2=−0.650, P2<0.001) were negatively correlated with MSGS-Q3 score after the first treatment.
    Conclusions The 131I DMR calculated by the dual-phase 131I WBS serves as a useful predictor of salivary gland dysfunction in patients with DTC treated with 131I after surgery. However, 131I DMR values from the first treatment has no clinical significance for predicting salivary gland dysfunction in patients after the second treatment.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return