[1]
|
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92(3):205-216. |
[2]
|
Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk:an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(3):776-790. |
[3]
|
Flamen P, Van Cutsem E, Lerut A, et al. Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol, 2002, 13(3):361-368. |
[4]
|
Swisher SG, Maish M, Erasmus JJ, et al. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 78(4):1152-1160. |
[5]
|
MacManus MP, Hicks R J, Matthews JP, et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(7):1285-1292. |
[6]
|
Hellwig D, Graeter TP, Ukena D, et al. Value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2004, 128(6):892-899. |
[7]
|
Pottgen C, Levegrun S, Theegarten D, et al. Value of 18F-fluoro-2-de-oxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer for prediction of pathologic re-sponse and times to relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res, 2006, 12(1):97-106. |
[8]
|
Kunkel M, Forster GJ, Reichert TE, et al. Radiation response non-invasively imaged by[18F]FDG-PET predicts local tumor control and survival in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol, 2003, 39(2):170-177. |
[9]
|
Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, et al. Posttherapy[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix:response and outcome. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(11):2167-2171. |
[10]
|
Schuetze SM. Rubln BP, Vernon C, et al. Use of positron emission tomography in localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer, 2005, 103(2):339-348. |
[11]
|
Brucher BL, Weber W, Bauer M, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma:response evaluation by positron emission tomography. Ann Surg, 2001,233(3):300-309. |
[12]
|
Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Ilson D, et al. Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy:results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(3):428-432. |
[13]
|
Weber WA, Ott K, Beckcr K, et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(12):3058-3065. |
[14]
|
Wieder HA, Brucher BL, Zimmermann F, et al. Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(5):900-908. |
[15]
|
Ott K, Fink U, Becket K, et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging:results of a prospeetive trial. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(24):4604-4610. |
[16]
|
Brun E, Kjellen E, Tennvall J, et al. FDG PET studies during treatment:prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck, 2002, 24(2):127-135. |
[17]
|
Avril N, Sassen S, Schmalfeldt B, et al. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(30):7445-7453. |
[18]
|
Weber WA, Petersen V, Schmidt B, et al. Positron emission tomography in non-smallcell lung cancer:prediction of response to chemotherapy by quantitative assessment of glucose use. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21(14):2651-2657. |
[19]
|
Hoekstra C J, Stroobants SG, Smit EF, et al. Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using[18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positronemission tomography in patients with locally advanced nonsmallcell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(33):8362-8370. |
[20]
|
Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belanl CP, et al. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346(2):92-98. |
[21]
|
Smith IC, Welch AE, Hutcheon AW, et al. Positron emission tomography using[18F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18(8):1676-1688. |
[22]
|
Schelling M, Avril N, Nahrig J, et al. Positron emission tomography using[18F]fluorodeoxyglueose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18(8):1689-1695. |
[23]
|
Hicks RJ, Mac Manus MP, Matthews JP, et al. Early FDG-PET imaging after radical radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer:inflammatory changes in normal tissues correlate with tumor response and do not confound therapeutic response evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 60(2):412-418. |