[1]
|
Kurokawa T, Yoshida Y, Kawahara K, et al. Expression of GLUT-1glucose transfer, cellular proliferation activity and grade of tumor correlate with [F-18]-fiuorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography in epithelial tumors of the ovary[J]. Int J Cancer,2004, 109(6):926-932. |
[2]
|
Torizuka T, Kanno T, Futatsubashi M, et al. Imaging of gynecologic tumors:comparison of (11)C-choline PET with (18)F-FDG PET[J].J Nucl Med,2003, 44(7):1051-1056. |
[3]
|
Robinson MK, Doss M, Shaller C, et al. Quantitative immuno-positron emission tomography imaging of HER2-positive tumor xenografts with an iodine-124 labeled anti-HER2 diabody[J]. Cancer Res, 2005,65(4):1471-1478. |
[4]
|
Nishizawa S, Inubushi M, Okada H. Physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the ovaries and uterus of healthy female volunteers[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2005, 32(5):549-556. |
[5]
|
Torizuka T, Nobezawa S, Kanno T, et al. Ovarian cancer recurrence:role of whole-body positron emission tomography using2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2002, 29(6):797-803. |
[6]
|
Nakamoto Y, Saga T, Ishimori I, et al. Clinical value of positron emission tomography with FDG for recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176(6):1449-1454. |
[7]
|
Menzel C, Dobert N, Hamscho N, et al. The influence of CA 125and CEA levels on the results of (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in suspected recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2004, 180(8):497-501. |
[8]
|
Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, et al. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2005, 97(1):183-191. |
[9]
|
Kim EE. Whole-body positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gynecologic oncology[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2004, 14(1):12-22. |
[10]
|
Unger JB, Ivy JJ, Connor P, et al. Detection of recurrent cervical cancer by whole-body FDG PET scan in asymptomatic and symptomatic women[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 94(1):212-216. |
[11]
|
Chang WC, Hung YC, Lin CC, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET to detect recurrent cervical cancer based on asymptomatically elevated tumor marker serum levels-a preliminary report[J]. Cancer Invest,2004, 22(2):180-184. |
[12]
|
Makhija S, Howden N, Edwards R, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the detection of recurrent ovarian and fallopian tube carcinoma:a retrospective review[J].Gynecol Oncol, 2002, 85(1):53-58. |
[13]
|
Bristow RE, delCarmen MG, Pannu HK, et al. Clinically occult recurrent ovarian cancer:patient selection for secondary cytoreduc-tive surgery usingcombinedPET/CT[J]. GynecolOncol, 2003, 90(3):519-528. |
[14]
|
Casey MJ, Gupta NC, Muths CK. Experience with positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1994, 53(5):331-338. |
[15]
|
Rose PG, Faulhaber P, Miraldi F, et al. Positive emission tomography for evaluating a complete clinical response in patients with ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma:correlation with second-look laparotomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001, 82(1):17-21. |
[16]
|
Zimny M, Siggelkow W, Schroder W, et al. 2-[Fluorine-18]-fluoro2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2001, 83(2):310-315. |
[17]
|
Miller TR, Grigsby PW. Measurement oftumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced cervical cancer treat-ed by radiation therapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 53(2):353-359. |
[18]
|
Barranger E, Kerrou K, Petegnief Y. Laparoscopic resection of occult metastasis using the combination of FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography image fusion with intraoperative probe guidance in a woman with recurrent ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 96(1):241-244. |
[19]
|
Smith GT, Hubner KF, McDonald T, et al. Cost analysis of FDG PET for managing patients with ovarian cancer[J]. Clin Positron Imaging, 1999, 2(2):63-70. |