20lTl定量门控心肌灌注体层显像与99mTc-红细胞门控心血池显像测定左心室射血分数的对比研究
Comparison study of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by 20lTl gated myocardial imaging and 99mTc-red blood cell gated blood-pool imaging
-
摘要: 目的 探讨20lTl定量门控心肌灌注体层显像与99mTc-红细胞门控心血池显像测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)的相关性。方法 72例受检者接受20lTl静息门控心肌灌注体层显像,用AUTOQUANT 4.21软件测量LVEF,并与24h内的静息99mTc-红细胞平衡法门控心血池显像结果进行比较。结果 ①门控心肌灌注体层显像与门控心血池显像测量LVEF值的结果呈明显正相关(r=0.554,P=0.000),两种方法无统计学差别(t=1.194,P>0.05)。②不同疾病组之间两种测量方法无统计学差异(P值均大于0.05)。③门控心肌灌注体层显像及门控心血池显像测量的LVEF值分别为(64.68±10.77)%和(62.46±8.99)%,门控心肌灌注体层显像测量的LVEF值要比门控心血池显像高出3.55%。结论 20lTl控心肌灌注体层显像与99mTc-红细胞门控心血池显像测量LVEF值的相关性好且结果准确,但门控心肌灌注体层显像的LVEF测量值要稍高于门控心血池显像。
-
关键词:
- 门控血池显像 /
- 门控心肌灌注显像 /
- 铊放射性同位素 /
- 体层摄影术,发射型计算机,单光子
Abstract: Objective To explore the correlation of automatic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with 20lTl and rest equilibrium gated blood-pool imaging with 99mTc-red blood cell. Methods Rest gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with 20lTl was performed on 72 cases. AUTOQUANT 4.21 software was used to measure LVEF. Rest equilibrium gated blood-pool imaging was also performed within 24 h. The values of LVEF measured by two methods were calculated and compared. Results ① There were strong correlation between the LVEF measured by rest gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and rest equilibrium gated blood-pool imaging(r=0.554, P=0.000). There was no significant difference between the two methods (t=1.194, P>0.05). ② There was no significant difference between the two methods among different disease groups. ③ The values of LVEF measured by two methods were (64.68 ±10.77)% and (62.46±8.99)%. The values of LVEF measured by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT was higher 3.55% than rest equilibrium gated blood-pool imaging. Conclusion There was good correlation between the LVEF measured with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT by AUTOQUANT 4.21 software and gated blood-pool imaging. The LVEF can be accurately evaluated using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT with 20lTl. The value of LVEF measured by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT was higher than rest equilibrium gated blood-pool imaging. -
[1] Xu H, Luo JX, Chen J, et al. ventricular function from gated Automatic quantification of left myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. Eur J Nucl Med, 1998, 25(8):903. [2] 杜雪梅,张欣,朱广文,等.99mTc-MIBI门控心肌断层显像与心血池显像测定左室射血分数的比较[J].大连医科大学学报,2004,26(2):128-130.
[3] 冯建林,李殿富,李建华,等.门控心肌显像结合GS Quant软件评价左室功能[J].南京医科大学学报:自然科学版,2004,24(4):390-392.
[4] Toba M, Kumita S, Cho K, et al. Comparison of Emory and Cedars-Sinai methods for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with a small heart[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2000, 14(6):421-426. [5] Nichols K, Lefkowitz D, Faber T, et al. Echocardiographic validation of gated SPECT ventricular function measurements[J]. J Nucl Med, 2000, 41(8):1308-1314. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1534
- HTML全文浏览量: 238
- PDF下载量: 2
下载: