PET在肿瘤方面应用的成本效益分析

顾爱春 黄钢

引用本文:
Citation:

PET在肿瘤方面应用的成本效益分析

  • 中图分类号: F224.5;R817.4

Cost-effective analysis of PET in oncology

  • CLC number: F224.5;R817.4

  • 摘要: PET技术的发展对肿瘤的诊断、分期、指导治疗产生了重要的影响。通过成本效益分析可以有效地从经济学的角度对PET的使用效率进行评价,达到最大程度节省医疗资源的目的。本文主要介绍了成本效益分析的方法以及PET在肿瘤方面的成本效益分析的现状。
  • [1] Valk PE,Pounds TR,Tesar RD,et al.Cost-effectiveness of PET imaging in clinical oncology.Nucl Med Biol,1996,23(6):737-743.
    [2] Gambhir SS,Shepherd JE,Shah BD,et al.Analytical decision model for the cost-effective management of solitary pulmonary nodules.J Clin Oncol,1998,16(6):2113-2125.
    [3] Miles KA.An approach to demonstrating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging modalities in Australia illustrated by PET.Austr Radiol,2001,45(1):9-18.
    [4] Keith CJ,Miles KA,Griffiths MR,et al.Solitary pulmonary nodules:accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2002,29(8):1016-1023.
    [5] Kosuda S,Ichihara K,Watanabe M,et al.Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in patients with pulmonary nodules(non-small cell lung carcinoma) in Japan.Chest,2000,117(2):346-353.
    [6] Dietlein M,Weber K,Gandiour A,et al.Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules:a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany.Eur J Nucl Med,2000,27(10):1441-1456.
    [7] Gugiatti A,Grimaldi A,Rossetti C,et al.Economic analyses on the use of positron emission tomography for the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules and for staging patients with non-small-celllung-cancer in Italy.Q J Nucl Med,2004,48(1):49-61.
    [8] Gambhir SS,Hoh CK,Phelps ME,et al.Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma.J Nucl Med,1996,37(9):1428-1436.
    [9] Scott WJ,Shelpherd J,Gambhir SS.Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small-cell lung carcinoma:a decision analysis.Ann Thorac Surg,1998,66(6):1876-1883.
    [10] Yap KK,Yap KS,Byrne AJ,et al.Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2005,32(9):1033-1040.
    [11] Alzahouri K,Lejeune C,Woronoff-Lemsi MC,et al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies introducing FDG-PET into the mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer from the French healthcare system perspective.Clin Radiol,2005,60(4):479-492.
    [12] Sloka JS,Hollett PD,Mathews M.Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography for non-small cell lung carcinoma in Canada.Med Sci Monit,2004,10(5):MT73-MT80.
    [13] Nguyen VH,Peloquin S,Lacasse Y.Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer in Quebec.Can Respir J,2005,12(1):19-25.
    [14] Kosuda S,Ichihara K,Watanabe M,et al.Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma in Japan.Ann Nucl Med,2002,16(4):263-271.
    [15] Dietlein M,Weber K,Gandiour A,et al.Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer:priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results.Eur J Nucl Med,2000,27(11):1598-1609.
    [16] Zubeldia JM,Bednarczyk EM,Baker JG,et al.The economic impact of 18FDG positron emission tomography in the surgical management of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases.Cancer Biother Radiopharm,2005,20(4):450-456.
    [17] Sloka JS,Hollett PD.Cost effectiveness of positron emission tomography in Canada.Med Sci Monit,2005,11(10):PH1-PH6.
    [18] Hollenbeak CS,Lowe VJ,Stack BC Jr.The cost-effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose 18-F positron emission tomography in the NO neck.Cancer,2001,92(9):2341-2348
    [19] Bongers V,Hobbelink MG,van Rijk PP,et al.Cost-effectiveness ofdual-head 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the detection of recurrent laryngeal cancer.Cancer Biother Radiopharm,2002,17(3):303-306.
    [20] Hoh CK,Glaspy J,Rosen P,et al.Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.J Nucl Med,1997,38(3):343-348.
    [21] Klose T,Leidl R,Buchmann I,et al.Primary staging of lymphomas:cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET versus computed tomography.Eur J Nucl Med,2000,27(10):1457-1464.
    [22] Sloka JS,Hollett PD,Mathews M.Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography in breast cancer.Mol Imaging Biol,2005,7(5):351-360.
    [23] Tsushima Y,Endo K.Analysis models to assess cost effectiveness of the four strategies for the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules.Med Sci Monit,2004,10(5):MT65-MT72.
  • [1] 夏伟罗全勇袁志斌 . PET-CT在肿瘤放射治疗中的应用. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2006, 30(6): 331-335.
    [2] 陈香赵晋华 . PET及PET-CT在监测肿瘤治疗效果中的价值. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2007, 31(6): 354-358.
    [3] 吕慧清张中民吕仲虹18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET在恶性肿瘤适形放射治疗中的价值. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2006, 30(6): 335-337.
    [4] 张佳胤李彪 . 正电子药物在肿瘤诊断中的进展. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2006, 30(1): 30-35.
    [5] 宋少莉黄钢18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖PET监测实体瘤放化疗疗效的应用进展. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2007, 31(5): 284-288.
    [6] 李小东张遵城董华董萍赵洪刚郭永涛 . 核医学技术在肿瘤治疗中的应用与进展. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2006, 30(3): 163-167.
    [7] 叶慧莫逸谢爱民彭翔18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT与99nTc-亚甲基二膦酸盐骨显像诊断转移性骨肿瘤的对比研究. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2008, 32(3): 147-150.
    [8] 川玲 . 双探头符合线路技术和检测肿瘤的价值. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2002, 26(1): 4-7.
    [9] 杨卫东朱承谟 . 肿瘤反义显像技术中的若干问题. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 1998, 22(6): 244-247.
    [10] 袁杰詹松华 . 磁共振弹性成像技术在肿瘤中的应用及研究进展. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2019, 43(2): 171-175. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2019.01.013
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1098
  • HTML全文浏览量:  116
  • PDF下载量:  2
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2005-05-29

PET在肿瘤方面应用的成本效益分析

  • 1. 200127 上海, 上海第二医科大学附属仁济医院核医学科;
  • 2. 200127 上海, 上海第二医科大学临床核医学研究所

摘要: PET技术的发展对肿瘤的诊断、分期、指导治疗产生了重要的影响。通过成本效益分析可以有效地从经济学的角度对PET的使用效率进行评价,达到最大程度节省医疗资源的目的。本文主要介绍了成本效益分析的方法以及PET在肿瘤方面的成本效益分析的现状。

English Abstract

参考文献 (23)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回