RBAP96 Mediates Radiosensitivity of Breast CancerCellsviaInteractingwithRetinoblastoma Protein

Zhang Junling Xiaolei Xue Qinghui Meng Ming Cui Saijun Fan

引用本文:
Citation:

RBAP96 Mediates Radiosensitivity of Breast CancerCellsviaInteractingwithRetinoblastoma Protein

    通讯作者: Saijun Fan, fansaijun@irm-cams.ac.cn
  • 基金项目:

    Peking Union Medical College Youth Innovation Fund 1581

    IRM-CAMS Research Fund 1614

    National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572969

    National Natural Science Foundation of China 81172127

    National Natural Science Foundation of China 81071906

    Technology and Development and Research Projects for Research Institutes, Ministry of Science and Technology 2014EG150134

    Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin 16JCQNJC13600

    Tianjin Science & Technology Pillar Program 14ZCZDSY00001

    National Natural Science Foundation of China 81402633

RBAP96 Mediates Radiosensitivity of Breast CancerCellsviaInteractingwithRetinoblastoma Protein

    Corresponding author: Saijun Fan, fansaijun@irm-cams.ac.cn
  • Fund Project: Peking Union Medical College Youth Innovation Fund 1581IRM-CAMS Research Fund 1614National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572969National Natural Science Foundation of China 81172127National Natural Science Foundation of China 81071906Technology and Development and Research Projects for Research Institutes, Ministry of Science and Technology 2014EG150134Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin 16JCQNJC13600Tianjin Science & Technology Pillar Program 14ZCZDSY00001National Natural Science Foundation of China 81402633

  • Figure 1.  RBAP96 protein sequence. A LXCXE motif (amino acid 513-517) is indicated as bold.

    Figure 2.  RBAP96 and RB interaction.A. In vivo association. MCF-7 or BT549 cells were transfected with a FLAG-wtRBAP96 expression vector; and IP-WB was performed, as described before[5]. A normal mouse IgG IP from MCF-7 cells was used as negative control. The IP antibodies used were: RBAP96 IP(anti-FLAG M2 antibody, Sigma) and RB IP(M-153, Santa Cruz); and the westen blot antibodies were: RBAP96[N20, a rabbit polyclonal IgG against recombinant GST-RBAP96(aa 25-105)]; and RB(C-15, Santa Cruz). The data are representative of three experiments. B. In vitro binding. IVT 35S-labeled wtRBAP96 or RBAP96-RXRXH proteins were prepared using the T7 promoter of p3XFALG vector.GST-RB and GST-RB-N757 vectors were described before[5]. The input lanes show 10% of the IVT product used for capture.

    Figure 3.  RBAP96 enhances RB-repression of E2F-responsive promoters.Exponentially growing SAOS-2 cells in 2 cm2 well dishes were transfected overnight with 0.25 μg of each vector per well using Lipofectamine 2000 and post-incubated for 24 h. The total transfected DNA was kept constant by adding control vector. The pRSV-β-gal plasmid was used to monitor transfection efficiency. Luciferase values are means ±SEMs from three independent experiments, each using 10 replicate wells per condition. The E2F reporter consists of an E2F binding site upstream of a TATA box and the luciferase gene; the cyclin A reporter contains nucleotides -608 to +97 of the human cyclin A promoter upstream of luciferase.

    Figure 4.  RBAP96 enhances radiosensitivity in MCF-7 cells, not in BT549 cells.The MCF-7 and BT549 cells were transfected with the p3XFLAG-wtRBAP96 or p3XFLAG-RBAP96/RXRXH expression plasmid as described in the"Materials and Methods", irradiated at indicated doses 24 h following transfection, and subjected to clonogenic survival assay.

  • [1]
    [2]
    [3]
    [4]
    [5]
    [6]
    [7]
    [8]
    [9]
    [10]
    [11]
    [12]
    [13]
    [14]
    [15]
    [16]
    [17]
  • [1] 殷丽娜张旭霞张俊香陈红红 . Wnt/β-catenin信号通路——乳腺癌的潜在治疗靶点. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2014, 38(4): 252-256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2014.04.011
    [2] 李航姜勉樊赛军 . 长链非编码RNA NBR2对乳腺癌细胞放射敏感性的影响. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2018, 42(2): 121-128. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2018.02.005
    [3] 刘建井边海曼马文娟王子阳陈薇朱磊戴东徐文贵 . 基于18F-FDG PET/CT图像建立的多元影像组学模型对乳腺癌原发灶HER-2表达状态的预测价值. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2022, 46(7): 430-440. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202203015-00206
    [4] 董佳佳章斌 . 多种影像学方法评价乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的价值比较. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2014, 38(6): 427-432. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2014.06.018
    [5] 金问森金一尊 . 整合素介导的细胞信号转导与肿瘤辐射敏感性. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2006, 30(4): 237-239.
    [6] 郭阳 . DNA链间交联的修复与辐射敏感性. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2007, 31(6): 371-372,376.
    [7] 张海兵章龙珍 . 低剂量照射在肿瘤治疗中的应用研究进展. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2008, 32(4): 243-246.
    [8] 李超李莉许昌韶周菊英徐晓婷俞志英 . 脑胶质瘤SHG-44细胞株照射后子代辐射敏感性. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2008, 32(4): 236-239.
    [9] 杨学琴刘芬菊 . 血小板衍生生长因子及其受体与肿瘤细胞的辐射抗性. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2008, 32(4): 240-243.
    [10] 翟红彦苏成海 . 基因治疗联合放射治疗恶性肿瘤的分子机制. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2009, 33(2): 113-116. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2009.02.015
    [11] 郭阳 . 错配修复系统缺陷对肿瘤放化疗的影响. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2011, 35(6): 363-365. doi: 10.3760,cma.j.issn.1673-4114.2011.06.011
  • 加载中
图(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2570
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1353
  • PDF下载量:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-08-18
  • 刊出日期:  2016-09-25

RBAP96 Mediates Radiosensitivity of Breast CancerCellsviaInteractingwithRetinoblastoma Protein

    通讯作者: Saijun Fan, fansaijun@irm-cams.ac.cn
  • Tianjin Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Molecular Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, China (Zhang JL, Lu L, Xue XL, Cui M, Fan SJ)
  • Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington DC 20079, USA (Meng QH)
基金项目:  Peking Union Medical College Youth Innovation Fund 1581IRM-CAMS Research Fund 1614National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572969National Natural Science Foundation of China 81172127National Natural Science Foundation of China 81071906Technology and Development and Research Projects for Research Institutes, Ministry of Science and Technology 2014EG150134Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin 16JCQNJC13600Tianjin Science & Technology Pillar Program 14ZCZDSY00001National Natural Science Foundation of China 81402633

English Abstract

  • The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein(called "RB"). Inactivation of which contributes to a broad range of tumors, including breast cancer[1]. The RB protein plays major roles in regulation of cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell fate, telomerase activity, and radiosensitivity. Nevertheless, the majority of human breast cancers does not contain a defective(mutated) or otherwise inactivated RB gene[2]. Thus, breast cancers have other mechanisms of overcoming the function of the RB protein, such as transcription repression and radiosensitivity, but these mechanisms are mostly unknown[3].

    In the current study, using a yeast two-hybrid screen of a human breast cDNA library, we isolated a novel RB-interacting protein that we named RBAP96 (for RB-Associated Protein of molecular size 96 kilo-daltons), and demonstrated that the 513LXCXE517 motif embedded inside the RBAP96 protein was necessary for binding of RBAP96 to RB, an intact A/B binding pocket of RB was also required for the binding. Furthermore, this motif was required for the functional consequences of the BRCA1:RB interaction, including RB-mediated transcriptional activation(E2F1 and Cyclin A) and RB-dependent radiosensitivity.

    • Human breast cancer MCF-7 and BT549 cells, and human osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells were obtained from the Georgetown University(Washington DC, USA), and maintained in Dulbecco′s modified Eagle′s medium(DMEM)(Gibco-BRL, USA) supplemented with 5%(MCF-7 and BT549) or 10% (SAOS-2) fetal bovine serum, non-essential amino acids(5 mmol/L), penicillin(100 U/mL), and streptomycin(100 μg/mL) in an incubator at 37℃ with 5% CO2.

    • The construction of p3XFLAG-RBAP96 expression plasmid was performed as the protocol described in our previous studies[4]. For transient transfection assays, subconfluent proliferating cells were incubated overnight with 10 μg of plasmid DNA per 100 mm dish, in the presence of Lipofectamine 2000, and then washed to remove the Lipofectamine 2000 and the excess plasmid DNA.

    • The transfected and untransfected cells were irradiated with various doses of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gy rays using a 137Cs irradiator at a dose rate of 1 Gy/min at room temperature.

    • Cells irradiated were plated in 60-mm culture dishes at a cell density of 2×103. After 3 weeks post-irradiation, cells were fixed and stained with Giemsa solution. Colonies containing > 50 cells were counted. Colony forming efficiency=number of colonies formed/number of cells plated.

    • Western blot analysis was carried out as described before[5]. Briefly, after cells were harvested and lysed, equal amounts of protein were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and blocked with 5% skimmed milk. The membranes were blotted with primary antibodies against the FLAG epitope(M2, mouse monoclonalantibody, Sigma, 1:500 dilution), RB(C-20, rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200), and α-actin(Ⅰ-19, goat polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA, 1:2000), and then incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-goat or anti-rabbit IgG antibodies(SantaCruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 1:2000). Protein bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system(Amersham Life Sciences, USA). Equality of protein loading was confirmed by fast green staining of the membrane and by immunoblotting for α-actin. Colored markers(BioRad Corp., USA) were used as molecular size standards.

    • Subconfluent proliferating cells were harvested, and nuclear extracts were prepared, as described earlier[4]. Each IP was carried out using 6 μg of antibody and 1000 μg of nuclear extract protein. Precipitated proteins were collected using protein G beads, washed, eluted in boiling Laemmli sample buffer, and subjected to Western blot assay. The IP antibodies used were: RBAP96 IP(anti-FLAG M2 antibody, Sigma, USA) and RB IP (M-153, Santa Cruz, USA); and the western blot antibodies were: RBAP96[N20, a rabbit polyclonal IgG against recombinant GST-RBAP96(aa 25-105)]; and RB(C-15, Santa Cruz, USA).

    • Transcriptional activity assay was described in our previous studies[4]. Briefly, sub-confluent proliferating cells in 24-well plastic dishes were incubated overnight with 0.5 μg of each vector in serum-free DMEM containing LipofectAMINE 2000(Life Technologies, Inc.). The total transfected DNA was kept constant by addition of an appropriate amount of the control vector. To control transfection efficiency, plasmid pRSV-β-gal was cotransfected to allow normalization of luciferase values to β-galactosidase activity in the same sample. The transfected cells were harvested for luciferase assays for 24 h. Luciferase activities were expressed relative to the un-transfected controls. Each experimental condition was tested in four replicate wells; and the experiments shown are representative of at least three independent experiments.

    • GST bead assays were performed essentially as described previously[5]. [35S]methionine-labeled proteins were prepared by in vitro transcription(using the T7 promoter of pcDNA3) and translation. The GST fusion proteins were generated from cDNAs cloned into the p-GEX vector, expressed in Escherichia coli, and purified by affinity chromatography. Labeled proteins were incubated with GST(control) or GST fusion proteins for 24 h at 4℃, recovered using glutathione agarose beads, eluted in boiling sample buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE autoradiography. GST fusion proteins were visualized by Western blot assay, using an anti-GST mouse monoclonal(B-14, 1:10 000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA).

    • Where appropriate, statistical comparisons were made using the two-tailed Student′s t test with the statistical software SPSS 13.0(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data are shown as the mean± standard error of the mean(SEM).

    • We conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen using the standard A/B pocket of RB[amino acid 395-876] as bait. After screening of a human breast cDNA library (Clontech, USA), we isolated and sequenced a single positive 2 564-bp clone that encodes a predicted protein of 854 amino acid, encoded by a gene of unknown function(Protein ID BAA91666)(Fig. 1). In vitro translation(IVT) gave a product close to the expected size of 96 000, which we named RB Associated Protein of 96 000(RBAP96). Structural features of RBAP96 include an LXCXE site(513LDCGE517), an essential role for the LXCXE(leucine-X-cysteine-X-glutamic; X=any amino acid) motif.

      Figure 1.  RBAP96 protein sequence. A LXCXE motif (amino acid 513-517) is indicated as bold.

    • We showed an in vivo association of RBAP96 with RB by IP-Western blot(Fig. 2A). RB was found in the RBAP96 IP of MCF-7 breast cancer cells containing wild-type(wt) RB, but not in the RBAP96 IPs of BT549 bearing an Rb deletion). Neither RB nor RBAP96 was found in the control IP(normal IgG) of MCF-7 cells. We also showed direct binding of RBAP96 to RB by GST capture assays. IVT wtRBAP96 bound to beads coated with GST-RB but not to beads coated with GST alone. IVT-RBAP96/RXRXH, in which 513LXCXE was converted to RXRXH, failed to bind to GST-RB(Fig. 2B). IVT-wtRBAP96 failed to bind to GST-RB-N757F, which contains a mutation of the A/B pocket of RB, suggesting that an intact A/B pocket of RB is required to bind RBAP96.

      Figure 2.  RBAP96 and RB interaction.A. In vivo association. MCF-7 or BT549 cells were transfected with a FLAG-wtRBAP96 expression vector; and IP-WB was performed, as described before[5]. A normal mouse IgG IP from MCF-7 cells was used as negative control. The IP antibodies used were: RBAP96 IP(anti-FLAG M2 antibody, Sigma) and RB IP(M-153, Santa Cruz); and the westen blot antibodies were: RBAP96[N20, a rabbit polyclonal IgG against recombinant GST-RBAP96(aa 25-105)]; and RB(C-15, Santa Cruz). The data are representative of three experiments. B. In vitro binding. IVT 35S-labeled wtRBAP96 or RBAP96-RXRXH proteins were prepared using the T7 promoter of p3XFALG vector.GST-RB and GST-RB-N757 vectors were described before[5]. The input lanes show 10% of the IVT product used for capture.

    • RB regulation of cell cycle progression depends upon the repression of E2F1-regulated transcription[4]. We tested the effect of RBAP96 on the RB-regulated activity of an E2F-responsive reporter. Exogenous RB inhibited the E2F1-induced activation of the E2F reporter in Rb-null SAOS-2 cells, and this inhibition was enhanced by co-expression of wtRBAP96(t=1.987, P < 0.001), but not by RBAP96/RXRXH or empty vector(Fig. 3), wtRBAP96 did not inhibit E2F1 activity without RB. wtRBAP96 also enhanced RB-mediated repression of the cyclin A promoter(another target of RB)(t=1.489, P < 0.01), suggesting that RBAP96 acts as a corepressor for RB transcriptional repression, at least E2F1 and cyclin A.

      Figure 3.  RBAP96 enhances RB-repression of E2F-responsive promoters.Exponentially growing SAOS-2 cells in 2 cm2 well dishes were transfected overnight with 0.25 μg of each vector per well using Lipofectamine 2000 and post-incubated for 24 h. The total transfected DNA was kept constant by adding control vector. The pRSV-β-gal plasmid was used to monitor transfection efficiency. Luciferase values are means ±SEMs from three independent experiments, each using 10 replicate wells per condition. The E2F reporter consists of an E2F binding site upstream of a TATA box and the luciferase gene; the cyclin A reporter contains nucleotides -608 to +97 of the human cyclin A promoter upstream of luciferase.

    • Finally, we determined any alteration of radiosensitivity in breast cancer cells with wild-type RB(MCF-7) vs. mutant(deleted) RB(BT549) by transfection of p3XFLAG-CMV, p3XFLAG-wtRBAP96 or p3XFLAG-RBAP96/RXRXH. As illustrated in Fig. 4, wtRBAP96 expression significantly increased MCF-7 cell susceptibility to γ-ray irradiation, but did not exhibit any effect in BT549 cells irradiated at the same condition. For example, IC90, a dose which inhibits 90% of cell survival, was 1.7 Gy(t=1.320, P < 0.05) in wtRBAP96 transfected cells compared to p3XFLAG-CMV transfected control cells(3.7 Gy). On other hand, RBAP96/RXRXH expression failed to cause any change of radiosensitivity. These results indicate that regulation of radiosensitivity by RBAP96 requires the interaction of RBAP96 with RB.

      Figure 4.  RBAP96 enhances radiosensitivity in MCF-7 cells, not in BT549 cells.The MCF-7 and BT549 cells were transfected with the p3XFLAG-wtRBAP96 or p3XFLAG-RBAP96/RXRXH expression plasmid as described in the"Materials and Methods", irradiated at indicated doses 24 h following transfection, and subjected to clonogenic survival assay.

    • Previous studies suggest that cell cycle regulatory proteins(G1/S cyclins and CDKs) and several DNA tumor viruses express proteins(E1a from adenovirus, E7 from HPV, and T antigen from SV40) affect RB functions, including cell growth, cell cycle and radiosensitivity, by interacting with RB via a LXCXE binding site[1-3]. Moreover, LXCXE sequence disruption in these proteins results in a loss of their effects on RB and their ability to transform cells, indicating the importance of the LXCXE binding site[6-10]. In the current study, we isolated a novel RB binding protein RBAP96 by a yeast two-hybrid screen using the standard A/B pocket of RB as bait. As well-known, RB contains at least four distinct protein-binding domains, including the large A/B pocket(amino acid 395-876), corresponding to the binding site for E2F, the A/B pocket, the C pocket, and the N-terminal domain. Our results with IP-Western blotting and GST capture assay revealed that RBAP96 associated with RB, the LXCXE motif embedded inside the RBAP96 protein (amino acid 513-517) and the A/B pocket of RB were absolutely required for RBAP96 binding to RB, suggesting that RBAP96 is a LXCXE-dependent RB interacting protein.

      RB encoding a tumor suppressor phosphoprotein is often lost or functionally inactivated in many types of tumors, and plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and telomerase activity by interacting with transcription factors and altering the activity of transcription factors[1-3, 11]. One target of RB is the E2F family of cell cycle transcription factors, the binding of which by RB blocks E2F- and cyclin A-mediated transcriptional activation[5, 12-13]. We found RBAP96 enhanced RB repression of E2F1 transcription activity. Not only E2F1, RB-mediated repression of cyclin A promoter transcription activity was also reinforced by RBAP96. As expected, mutation of LXCXE motif failed to produce any impact on RB transcriptional repression. These findings suggest that RBAP96 not only interacts with RB, but also affect RB regulation of transcription activity, and the LXCXE motif is also essential.

      RB is an important target in cancer radiotherapy, including breast cancer[14-15]. Our further studies demonstrated that RBAP96 significantly increased human breast cancer cell susceptibility to γ-ray irradiation via a RB-interacting dependent manner, since such increased radiosensitivity was only seen in MCF-7 cells containing intact RB function, but in BT-549 bearing mutant(deleted) RB. Moreover, RBAP96 with a mutant LXCXE motif failed to influence radiosensitivity in both MCF-7 and BT-549 cell lines. These results make clear that the LXCXE motif is not only essential for the RBAP96: RB interaction, but also necessary for RBAP96-mediated regulation of RB transcription repression and radiosensitivity. A follow-up study is being carried out to determine whether RBAP96 affects DNA damage and repair pathway via interacting with other as-yet-undefined cellular regulators, except binding to RB. Additionally, our previous studies found that HMGB1-4, other new RB binding proteins by a LXCXE motif, affected radiosensitivity via a RB-dependent or independent manner[16-17]. Together, these findings that the interaction with RB is necessary in mediating radiosensitivty for some of RB associated proteins, such as RBAP96, but not critical for other RB-associated proteins, including HMGB1[16-17]. It will be very interesting to explore what mechanism(s) involved in such difference.

      Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

      Authors contribution statement Cell culture, survival and Western blot assay were carried out by Junling Zhang, Xiaolei Xue, Lu Lu, Ming Cui. Construction of expression vectors and IP-Western blot were conducted by Qinghui Meng. Junling Zhang and Saijun Fan were in change of experiment design and writing.

参考文献 (17)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回