-
放射性核素肾动态显像是评价肾脏功能尤其是肾小球滤过功能的重要指标[1-2],能准确判断早期肾功能异常患者的肾脏功能[3]。99Tcm-DTPA是临床上常用的肾放射性核素显像剂,具有简便、准确、安全等优点,可为临床提供良好的诊断依据[3-4]。肾动态显像检查需要弹丸注射显像剂,由于弹丸注射质量直接影响显像结果,因此对注射要求较高。目前,弹丸注射有直接弹丸注射法、留置针注射法、三通管注射法、静脉液路注射法等方法,他们各有优缺点[5],但如何简便、科学地选择合适的注射方式尚无统一标准。本文将不同弹丸注射方式在核素肾动态显像中的应用研究进展综述如下。
放射性核素肾动态显像弹丸注射方法的应用研究进展
Application study of pellet injection method of nuclide kidney dynamic imaging
-
摘要: 肾动态显像检查需要弹丸注射显像剂,由于弹丸注射质量直接影响显像结果,因此对注射要求较高。笔者就直接弹丸注射法、三通管注射法、留置针注射法、静脉液路注射法及其他方法在核素肾动态显像中的应用作一综述,分析多种弹丸注射方式的优缺点,为提高核素肾动态显像弹丸注射的成功率提供参考。Abstract: In renal dynamic imaging, shot injection is needed, because the quality of shot injection directly affects the imaging result, therefore, the injection requirements are higher. This article reviews the application of direct injection, three-way injection, indwelling needle injection, intravenous injection and other methods in radionuclide renal dynamic imaging, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of various injection methods, to provide reference for improving the success rate of nuclide kidney dynamic pellet injection.
-
[1] 卢婷婷, 汪永红, 占增平, 等. 肾动态显像法在评价肾功能变化中的应用价值[J]. 中国医药指南, 2018, 16(14): 161−162. DOI: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2018.14.131.
Lu TT, Wang YH, Zhan ZP, et al. Application value of renal dynamic imaging in evaluating changes of renal function[J]. Guide China Med, 2018, 16(14): 161−162. DOI: 10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2018.14.131.[2] 瞿华生, 黄占文, 张定成, 等. 不同采集方法采集满空针计数对肾动态显像测定GFR值的影响[J]. 四川医学, 2018, 39(3): 249−251. DOI: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2018.03.001.
Qu HS, Huang ZW, Zhang DC, et al. Effects of different collection methods on the GFR value of renal dynamic imaging[J]. Sichuan Med J, 2018, 39(3): 249−251. DOI: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2018.03.001.[3] 聂红洲, 朱娴. 99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像在慢性肾脏疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 临床合理用药, 2018, 11(2A): 42−45. DOI: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2018.04.021.
Nie HZ, Zhu X. The clinical value of 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging in chronic kidney disease[J]. Chin J of Clinical Rational Drug Use, 2018, 11(2A): 42−45. DOI: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2018.04.021.[4] Galuska L, Barna SK, Varga J, et al. The role of 99mTc-DTPA retrobulbar SPECT in staging and follow-up of Graves' orbitopathy[J]. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur, 2018, 21(1): 54−58. DOI: 10.5603/NMR.a2018.0005. [5] 雷蕾, 张莉, 杜涛. 3种“弹丸”注射法在肾动态显像中的效果比较[J]. 广东医学, 2013, 34(1): 106−107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2013.01.045.
Lei L, Zhang L, Du T, et al. Comparison of the effects of three kinds of bolus injection methods in renal dynamic imaging[J]. Guangdong Med J, 2013, 34(1): 106−107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2013.01.045.[6] 贾晓娟, 韩军, 曾强生, 等. “弹丸”注射质量与核素肾动态显像结果的关系[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2011, 27(25): 47−48. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2011.25.029.
Jia XJ, Han J, Zeng QS, et al. The relationship between the quality of bolus injection and the results of radionuclide renal dynamic imaging[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2011, 27(25): 47−48. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2011.25.029.[7] 谭丽玲, 陈莉, 陈新, 等. 护理干预在肾动态显像中的应用价值[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2017, 24(7): 713−715. DOI: 10.19522/j.cnki.1671-5098.2017.07.002.
Tan LL, Chen L, Chen X, et al. Value of nursing intervention in the successful or not renal dynamic imaging[J]. J Pract Med Tech, 2017, 24(7): 713−715. DOI: 10.19522/j.cnki.1671-5098.2017.07.002.[8] 何宗喜, 陈飞, 李素平, 等. SPECT-CT肾动态显像图像质量常见影响因素分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2017, 14(10): 29−32. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2017.10.009.
He ZX, Chen F, Li SP, et al. Analysis of common influence factors for image quality of dynamic renography of SPECT-CT[J]. China Med Equip, 2017, 14(10): 29−32. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1672-8270.2017.10.009.[9] Ishida M, Schuster A, Morton G, et al. Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2011, 13(1): 28. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-28. [10] 张文艳, 吴大勇, 边艳珠, 等. 不同静脉注射方法对99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像弹丸注射质量的影响[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2013, 29(34): 4−7. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2013.34.002.
Zhang WY, Wu DY, Bian YZ, et al. Influence of different injection techniques on the quality of bolus in 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2013, 29(34): 4−7. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2013.34.002.[11] 李鲜花. 不同“弹丸”注射部位对核素肾动态显像质量影响的分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2017, 26(6): 1663.
Li XH. Analysis of the influence of different bolus injection sites on the quality of radionuclide renal dynamic imaging[J]. Modern Med Imag, 2017, 26(6): 1663.[12] 赵亚清, 郭巍, 杜爽. “弹丸”注射护理干预在肾动态显像检查中的应用[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2016, 23(9): 999−1001. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2016.09.008.
Zhao YQ, Guo W, Du S. Application of contrast material bolus injection in renal dynamic imaging[J]. Labeled Immunoassays & Clin Med, 2016, 23(9): 999−1001. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2016.09.008.[13] 姚少红, 蒋炳辰, 杨晓明, 等. 三种注射法在肾动态显像中的“弹丸”质量比较[J]. 海南医学, 2014, 25(19): 2946−2947. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2014.19.1158.
Yao SH, Jiang BC, Yang XM, et al. Comparison of the bolus quality of three injection methods in renal dynamic imaging[J]. Hainan Med J, 2014, 25(19): 2946−2947. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2014.19.1158.[14] 马婷, 李雪娜, 李亚明, 等. 应用主动脉弓峰半高宽评价脑血流灌注显像中三通管注射法和头皮针注射法的“弹丸”质量[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2019, 48(7): 611−614. DOI: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2019.07.008.
Ma T, Li XN, Li YM, et al. Evaluation of the quality of bolus injection in cerebral blood flow perfusion imaging through two injection methods[J]. J China Med Univ, 2019, 48(7): 611−614. DOI: 10.12007/j.issn.0258-4646.2019.07.008.[15] 赵莎. 改良Y型留置针针口注射法在肾动态显像中的效果分析[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2018, 27(8): 854−855. DOI: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2018.08.028.
Zhao S. Analysis of the effect of modified Y-type indwelling needle injection method in renal dynamic imaging[J]. Chin J Convalescent Med, 2018, 27(8): 854−855. DOI: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2018.08.028.[16] 雷蕾, 杜涛, 张琴. 静脉留置针在核素显像中的优势[J]. 华西医学, 2016, 31(8): 1416−1419. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.20160385.
Lei L, Du T, Zhang Q. Advantage of venous indwelling needle in radionuclide imaging[J]. West China Med J, 2016, 31(8): 1416−1419. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.20160385.[17] Assadi M, Eftekhari M, Hozhabrosadati M, et al. Comparison of methods for determination of glomerular filtration rate: low and high-dose Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine clearance method, and plasma sample method[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2008, 40(4): 1059−1065. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9446-4. [18] 张峰, 谢良骏, 曹素娥, 等. 分析99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像Gates法与双血浆法评估分肾功能的价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志: 电子版, 2017, 11(4): 14−16[2020-04-07]. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/88771X/201704/673076537.html. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.04.004.
Zhang F, Xie LJ, Cao SE, et al. Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate using 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal imaging Gates method and double-phase plasma method[J/OL]. Chin J Endourol: Electric Ed, 2017, 11(4): 14−16[2020-04-07]. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/88771X/201704/673076537.html. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2017.04.004.[19] 吕延娟. 护理干预在放射性核素肾动态显像检查患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2018, 18(39): 28−29. DOI: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2018.39.013.
Lyu YJ. Analysis of the effect of nursing intervention in patients with radionuclide renal dynamic imaging[J]. World Latest Med Inf, 2018, 18(39): 28−29. DOI: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2018.39.013.[20] Wesolowski MJ, Conrad GR, Šámal M, et al. A simple method for determining split renal function from dynamic 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphic data[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2016, 43(3): 550−558. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3216-1. [21] 张文艳, 吴大勇, 边艳珠, 等. 静脉血管选择对99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像弹丸注射质量的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2014, 11(8): 140−141. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2014.08.078.
Zhang WY, Wu DY, Bian YZ, et al. Effect of veins to the quality of bolus injection in 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging[J]. Nurs Pract & Res, 2014, 11(8): 140−141. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2014.08.078.[22] Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA (stannous)[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1982, 138(3): 565−570. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.3.565. [23] 陆素青, 卢彦祺, 付巍. 血管评估监测表在核素肾动态显像中的应用研究[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2019, 26(9): 1528−1531. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2019.09.019.
Lu SQ, Lu YQ, Fu W. Application of vascular assessment and monitoring table in radionuclide renal dynamic imaging[J]. Labeled Immunoassays & Clin Med, 2019, 26(9): 1528−1531. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2019.09.019.[24] 冯军, 曹俊杰, 王芳, 等. 血管评估监测表在神经内科静脉输液患者中的应用[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2014, 26(5): 102−104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095.140X.2014.05.028.
Feng J, Cao JJ, Wang F, et al. Vascular assessment monitoring table in application of patients with venous transfusion in neurology department[J]. Med & Pharm J Chin PLA, 2014, 26(5): 102−104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095.140X.2014.05.028.[25] 聂雷霞, 张敏, 胡帆, 等. 浅静脉血管评级在静脉输液穿刺管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(11): 38−41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2012.11.011.
Nie LX, Zhang M, Hu F, et al. Application of superficial vein vascular rating in the management of venous transfusion puncture[J]. J Nurs, 2012, 19(11): 38−41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2012.11.011.[26] Gates GF. Glomerular filtration rate: estimation from fractional renal accumulation of 99mTc-DTPA (stannous)[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1982, 138(3): 565−570. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.3.565. [27] 杨艳, 杨葵英, 徐健华. 静脉血管评估分级配合输液信息卡在儿科门急诊中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2012, 26(28): 2662−2663. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2012.28.032.
Yang Y, Yang KY, Xu JH. Application of venous vascular assessment grading coordinating to transfusion information card in outpatient and emergency of pediatric department[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2012, 26(28): 2662−2663. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2012.28.032.
计量
- 文章访问数: 3483
- HTML全文浏览量: 2854
- PDF下载量: 23