[1] |
Moura C, Leite MI, Parreira R, et al. Primary breast lymphoma[J/OL]. J Surg Case Rep, 2020, 2020(1): rjz405[2020-04-20]. https://academic.oup.com/jscr/article/2020/1/rjz405/5706871. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjz405. |
[2] |
Thomas A, Link BK, Altekruse S, et al.
Primary breast lymphoma in the United States: 1975−2013[J]. J Natl Cancer InstJ Natl Cancer Inst, 2017, 109(6): djw294-.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw294 |
[3] |
Nicholson BT, Bhatti RM, Glassman L.
Extranodal lymphoma of the breast[J]. Radiol Clin North AmRadiol Clin North Am, 2016, 54(4): 711-726.
doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.03.005 |
[4] |
Frederiksen JK, Sharma M, Casulo C, et al.
Systematic review of the effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration and/or core needle biopsy for subclassifying lymphoma[J]. Arch Pathol Lab MedArch Pathol Lab Med, 2015, 139(2): 245-251.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0674-RA |
[5] |
Vaupel P, Schmidberger H, Mayer A.
The Warburg effect: essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression[J]. Int J Radiat BiolInt J Radiat Biol, 2019, 95(7): 912-919.
doi: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1589653 |
[6] |
Rahman WT, Wale DJ, Viglianti BL, et al.
The impact of infection and inflammation in oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging[J]. Biomed PharmacotherBiomed Pharmacother, 2019, 117: 109168-.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109168 |
[7] |
Kim DH, Jeong JY, Lee SW, et al.
18F-FDG PET/CT finding of bilateral primary breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma[J]. Clin Nucl MedClin Nucl Med, 2015, 40(2): e148-e149.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000545 |
[8] |
Wiseman C, Liao KT.
Primary lymphoma of the breast[J]. CancerCancer, 1972, 29(6): 1705-1712.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197206)29:6<1705::aid-cncr2820290640>3.0.co;2-i |
[9] |
Picasso R, Tagliafico A, Calabrese M, et al.
Primary and secondary breast lymphoma: focus on epidemiology and imaging features[J]. Pathol Oncol ResPathol Oncol Res, 2020, 26(3): 1483-1488.
doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00730-0 |
[10] |
Jung HK, Kim EK, Yun MJ, et al.
Bilateral breasts involvement in Burkitt's lymphoma detected only by FDG-PET[J]. Clin ImagingClin Imaging, 2006, 30(1): 57-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.08.001 |
[11] |
Santra A, Kumar R, Reddy R, et al.
FDG PET-CT in the management of primary breast lymphoma[J]. Clin Nucl MedClin Nucl Med, 2009, 34(12): 848-853.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181becdfc |
[12] |
Raj SD, Shurafa M, Shah Z, et al.
Primary and secondary breast lymphoma: clinical, pathologic, and multimodality imaging review[J]. RadiographicsRadiographics, 2019, 39(3): 610-625.
doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180097 |
[13] |
Yang WT, Lane DL, Le-Petross HT, et al.
Breast lymphoma: imaging findings of 32 tumors in 27 patients[J]. RadiologyRadiology, 2007, 245(3): 692-702.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2452061726 |
[14] |
Rosenkrantz AB, Friedman K, Chandarana H, et al.
Current status of hybrid PET/MRI in oncologic imaging[J]. AJR Am J RoentgenolAJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 206(1): 162-172.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14968 |
[15] |
石琴, 张文, 付志明, 等.
肿块型与非肿块型乳腺癌MRI弥散加权成像表观扩散系数与分子生物学指标的相关性研究[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2020, 44(4): 225-230.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-201903008-00019 Shi Q, Zhang W, Fu ZM, et al. Study on the correlation between MRI diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient and molecular biological indexes of mass-like and non-mass-like breast cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Med Nucl MedInt J Radiat Med Nucl Med, 2020, 44(4): 225-230. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-201903008-00019 |
[16] |
Maurya V, Singh G, Ram B, et al.
Multimodality imaging features of primary breast lymphoma — a rare entity[J]. Indian J Radiol ImagingIndian J Radiol Imaging, 2019, 29(1): 85-88.
doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_344_18 |
[17] |
Plecha DM, Faulhaber P.
PET/MRI of the breast[J]. Eur J RadiolEur J Radiol, 2017, 94: A26-A34.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.006 |
[18] |
Kong EJ, Cho IH.
F-18 FDG PET/MRI findings of primary breast lymphoma in two cases: FDG PET/MRI findings of primary breast lymphoma[J]. Clin ImagingClin Imaging, 2015, 39(4): 682-684.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.01.015 |
[19] |
Zhou CY, Lv K, Lin DY, et al.
Radiological analysis of breast lymphoma: experiences from cases series studies[J]. Medicine (Baltimore)Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(48): e18101-.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018101 |
[20] |
汤泊, 丁重阳.
原发乳腺淋巴瘤的18F-FDG PET/CT表现[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学影像诊断与介入放射学, 2016, 25(4): 293-296.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8001.2016.04.006 Tang B, Ding CY. 18F-FDG PET/CT features of primary breast lymphoma[J]. Diagn Imaging Interv RadiolDiagn Imaging Interv Radiol, 2016, 25(4): 293-296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8001.2016.04.006 |
[21] |
张白露, 周清华.
原发性乳腺淋巴瘤的临床病理学及影像学特征[J]. 肿瘤肿瘤, 2019, 39(5): 398-405.
doi: 10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2019.44.775 Zhang BL, Zhou QH. Clinicopathological and imaging characteristics of primary breast lymphoma[J]. TumorTumor, 2019, 39(5): 398-405. doi: 10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2019.44.775 |
[22] |
Wienbeck S, Meyer HJ, Uhlig J, et al. Radiological imaging characteristics of intramammary hematological malignancies: results from a German multicenter study[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 7435[2020-04-20]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07409-z. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07409-z. |
[23] |
Soussan M, Orlhac F, Boubaya M, et al. Relationship between tumor heterogeneity measured on FDG-PET/CT and pathological prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e94017[2020-04-20]. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094017. |
[24] |
Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al. Breast cancer[J/OL]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2019, 5(1): 66[2020-04-20]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41572-019-0111-2. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2. |
[25] |
Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, et al.
The evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of breast cancer[J]. Mol Imaging BiolMol Imaging Biol, 2019, 21(1): 1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11307-018-1181-3 |
[26] |
Wang LJ, Wang DB, Chai WM, et al.
MRI features of breast lymphoma: preliminary experience in seven cases[J]. Diagn Interv RadiolDiagn Interv Radiol, 2015, 21(6): 441-447.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14534 |
[27] |
Ou XJ, Zhang J, Wang J, et al. Radiomics based on 18F-FDG PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine-learning approach: a preliminary study[J/OL]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(2): 496−506[2020-04-20]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.2711. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2711. |
[28] |
Chen W, Zhu L, Yu XZ, et al.
Quantitative assessment of metabolic tumor burden in molecular subtypes of primary breast cancer with FDG PET/CT[J]. Diagn Interv RadiolDiagn Interv Radiol, 2018, 24(6): 336-341.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.17367 |
[29] |
叶慧, 樊仁为, 唐蜜, 等.
18F-FDG PET/CT显像对乳腺肿瘤诊断临床应用价值[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学影像诊断与介入放射学, 2013, 22(4): 282-285.
doi: 10.3969/issn.1005-8001.2013.04.012 Ye H, Fan RW, Tang M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of breast tumor[J]. Diagn Imaging Interv RadiolDiagn Imaging Interv Radiol, 2013, 22(4): 282-285. doi: 10.3969/issn.1005-8001.2013.04.012 |
[30] |
Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, et al.
Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 40(1): 133-140.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2247-0 |
[31] |
Harvey JA, Mahoney MC, Newell MS, et al.
ACR appropriateness criteria palpable breast masses[J]. J Am Coll RadiolJ Am Coll Radiol, 2016, 13(11 Suppl): S31-42.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.022 |
[32] |
Jabbour G, El-Mabrok G, Al-Thani H, et al. Primary breast lymphoma in a woman: a case report and review of the literature[J/OL]. Am J Case Rep, 2016, 17: 97−103[2020-04-20]. https://www.amjcaserep.com/abstract/index/idArt/896264. DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.896264. |
[33] |
Liu PP, Wang KF, Jin JT, et al. Role of radiation therapy in primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a SEER database analysis[J/OL]. Cancer Med, 2018, 7(5): 1845−1851[2020-04-20]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cam4.1457. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1457. |
[34] |
Chan HP, Liu WS, Liou WS, et al.
Comparison of FDG-PET/CT for cancer detection in populations with different risks of underlying malignancy[J]. In VivoIn Vivo, 2020, 34(1): 469-478.
doi: 10.21873/invivo.11797 |
[35] |
Zhao PQ, Zhu L, Song Z, et al.
Combination of baseline total metabolic tumor volume measured on FDG-PET/CT and β2-microglobulin have a robust predictive value in patients with primary breast lymphoma[J]. Hematol OncolHematol Oncol, 2020, 38(4): 493-500.
doi: 10.1002/hon.2763 |
[36] |
Mayerhoefer ME, Karanikas G, Kletter K, et al.
Can interim 18F-FDG PET or diffusion-weighted MRI predict end-of-treatment outcome in FDG-avid MALT lymphoma after rituximab-based therapy?: a preliminary study in 15 patients[J]. Clin Nucl MedClin Nucl Med, 2016, 41(11): 837-843.
doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001395 |
[37] |
Zhu AZ, Lee D, Shim H.
Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response[J]. Semin OncolSemin Oncol, 2011, 38(1): 55-69.
doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.11.012 |