[1] |
陈万青, 李贺, 孙可欣, 等.
2014年中国恶性肿瘤发病和死亡分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志中华肿瘤杂志, 2018, 40(1): 5-13.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.01.002 Chen WQ, Li H, Sun KX, et al. Report of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China, 2014[J]. Chin J OncolChin J Oncol, 2018, 40(1): 5-13. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.01.002 |
[2] |
Jones DR, Parker LA Jr, Detterbeck FC, et al.
Inadequacy of computed tomography in assessing patients with esophageal carcinoma after induction chemoradiotherapy[J]. CancerCancer, 1999, 85(5): 1026-1032.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1026::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-N |
[3] |
Laterza E, De Manzoni G, Guglielmi A, et al.
Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Staging of Esophageal Carcinoma After Preoperative Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy[J]. Ann Thorac SurgAnn Thorac Surg, 1999, 67(5): 1466-1469.
doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00267-2 |
[4] |
Westerterp M, Van Westreenen HL, Reitsma JB, et al.
Esophageal Cancer: CT, Endoscopic US, and FDG PET for Assessment of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy—Systematic Review[J]. RadiologyRadiology, 2005, 236(3): 841-851.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041042 |
[5] |
Kroep JR, Van Groeningen CJ, Cuesta MA, et al.
Positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose for response monitoring in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer; a comparison of different analytical methods[J]. Mol Imaging BiolMol Imaging Biol, 2003, 5(5): 337-346.
doi: 10.1016/j.mibio.2003.09.007 |
[6] |
Kukar M, Alnaji RM, Jabi F, et al.
Role of Repeat 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Examination in Predicting Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma[J]. JAMA SurgJAMA Surg, 2015, 150(6): 555-562.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3867 |
[7] |
李夷民, 林勤, 王丽琛, 等.
序贯18F-FDG PET/CT显像在非手术治疗食管癌同步放化疗疗效预测中的价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2013, 33(6): 405-411.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2013.06.002 Li YM, Lin Q, Wang LC, et al. Predictive value of sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in concurrent chemoradiotherapy of non-surgical esophageal carcinoma[J]. Chin J Nucl Med Mol ImagingChin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 33(6): 405-411. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2013.06.002 |
[8] |
Xi M, Liao ZX, Hofstetter WL, et al.
18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2017, 58(11): 1756-1763.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.192591 |
[9] |
Van Rossum PSN, Fried DV, Zhang LF, et al.
The value of 18F-FDG PET before and after induction chemotherapy for the early prediction of a poor pathologic response to subsequent preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2017, 44(1): 71-80.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3478-2 |
[10] |
Chhabra A, Ong LT, Kuk D, et al.
Prognostic significance of PET assessment of metabolic response to therapy in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Br J CancerBr J Cancer, 2015, 113(12): 1658-1665.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.416 |
[11] |
Arnett ALH, Merrell KW, Macintosh EM, et al.
Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Predicting Histopathologic Response in Esophageal Carcinoma following Chemoradiation[J]. J Thorac OncolJ Thorac Oncol, 2017, 12(1): 121-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.136 |
[12] |
Elliott JA, O'Farrell NJ, King S, et al.
Value of CT–PET after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the prediction of histological tumour regression, nodal status and survival in oesophageal adenocarcinoma[J]. Br J SurgBr J Surg, 2014, 101(13): 1702-1711.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9670 |
[13] |
Piessen G, Petyt G, Duhamel A, et al.
Ineffectiveness of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Evaluation of Tumor Response After Completion of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer[J]. Ann SurgAnn Surg, 2013, 258(1): 66-76.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828676c4 |
[14] |
Wieder HA, Brücher BLDM, Zimmermann F, et al.
Time Course of Tumor Metabolic Activity During Chemoradiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Response to Treatment[J]. J Clin OncolJ Clin Oncol, 2004, 22(5): 900-908.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.122 |
[15] |
Kwee RM.
Prediction of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer with Use of 18F FDG PET: A Systematic Review[J]. RadiologyRadiology, 2010, 254(3): 707-717.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.09091324 |
[16] |
Jayachandran P, Pai RK, Quon A, et al.
Postchemoradiotherapy Positron Emission Tomography Predicts Pathologic Response and Survival in Patients With Esophageal Cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol PhysInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 84(2): 471-477.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.029 |
[17] |
Elimova E, Wang XM, Etchebehere E, et al.
18F-FDG PET/CT as Predictive of Response after Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancer Patients[J]. Eur J CancerEur J Cancer, 2015, 51(17): 2545-2552.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.044 |
[18] |
Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al.
Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations[J]. Eur J CancerEur J Cancer, 1999, 35(13): 1773-1782.
doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4 |
[19] |
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al.
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2009, 50(S1): S122-150.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 |
[20] |
Yanagawa M, Tatsumi M, Miyata H, et al.
Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Versus Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2012, 53(6): 872-880.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098699 |
[21] |
Been LB, Suurmeijer AJH, Cobben DCP, et al.
[18F]FLT-PET in oncology: current status and opportunities[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004, 31(12): 1659-1672.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1687-6 |
[22] |
Yue JB, Chen LS, Cabrera AR, et al.
Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation with 18F-FLT PET During Radiotherapy of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Clinical Study[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2010, 51(4): 528-534.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.072124 |
[23] |
Chen HJ, Li YM, Wu H, et al.
3’-Deoxy-3’-[18F]-fluorothymidine PET/CT in early determination of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer: Comparison with[18F]-FDG PET/CT[J]. Strahlenther OnkolStrahlenther Onkol, 2015, 191(2): 141-152.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0744-8 |
[24] |
Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, et al.
Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study[J]. Radiother OncolRadiother Oncol, 2005, 77(1): 18-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038 |
[25] |
Rajendran JG, Wilson DC, Conrad EU, et al.
[18F]FMISO and[18F]FDG PET imaging in soft tissue sarcomas: correlation of hypoxia, metabolism and VEGF expression[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2003, 30(5): 695-704.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1096-7 |
[26] |
Rasey JS, Koh WJ, Evans ML, et al.
Quantifying regional hypoxia in human tumors with positron emission tomography of[18F]fluoromisonidazole: A pretherapy study of 37 patients[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol PhysInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1996, 36(2): 417-428.
doi: 10.1016/S0360-016(96)00325-2 |
[27] |
Rajendran JG, Schwartz DL, O'Sullivan J, et al.
Tumor Hypoxia Imaging with[F-18] Fluoromisonidazole Positron Emission Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer[J]. Clin Cancer ResClin Cancer Res, 2006, 12(18): 5435-5441.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1773 |
[28] |
Okamoto S, Shiga T, Yasuda K, et al.
High Reproducibility of Tumor Hypoxia Evaluated by 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET for Head and Neck Cancer[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2013, 54(2): 201-207.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.109330 |
[29] |
Grkovski M, Schwartz J, Gönen M, et al.
Feasibility of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Kinetic Modeling in Head and Neck Cancer Using Shortened Acquisition Times[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2016, 57(3): 334-341.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160168 |
[30] |
Tachibana I, Nishimura Y, Shibata T, et al.
A prospective clinical trial of tumor hypoxia imaging with 18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography and computed tomography (F-MISO PET/CT) before and during radiation therapy[J]. J Radiat ResJ Radiat Res, 2013, 54(6): 1078-1084.
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrt033 |
[31] |
Okamoto S, Shiga T, Yasuda K, et al.
The reoxygenation of hypoxia and the reduction of glucose metabolism in head and neck cancer by fractionated radiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2016, 43(12): 2147-2154.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3431-4 |
[32] |
Grönroos T, Eskola O, Lehtiö K, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of[18F]FETNIM: A Potential Hypoxia Marker for PET[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2001, 42(9): 1397-1404.
|
[33] |
Lehtiö K, Oikonen V, Nyman S, et al.
Quantifying tumour hypoxia with fluorine-18 fluoroerythronitroimidazole ([18F]FETNIM) and PET using the tumour to plasma ratio[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2003, 30(1): 101-108.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1016-x |
[34] |
Grönroos T, Bentzen L, Marjamäki P, et al.
Comparison of the biodistribution of two hypoxia markers [18F]FETNIM and[18F]FMISO in an experimental mammary carcinoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004, 31(4): 513-520.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1404-x |
[35] |
Yang DJ, Wallace S, Cherif A, et al.
Development of F-18-labeled Fluoroerythronitroimidazole as a PET Agent for Imaging Tumor Hypoxia[J]. RadiologyRadiology, 1995, 194(3): 795-800.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862981 |
[36] |
Yue J, Yang Y, Cabrera AR, et al.
Measuring tumor hypoxia with 18F-FETNIM PET in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical study[J]. Dis EsophagusDis Esophagus, 2012, 25(1): 54-61.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01209.x |
[37] |
Höglund J, Shirvan A, Antoni G, et al.
18F-ML-10, a PET Tracer for Apoptosis: First Human Study[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2011, 52(5): 720-725.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.081786 |
[38] |
胡四龙. 18F-ML-10 PET/CT评价胰腺癌放化疗后细胞凋亡的实验研究[D]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2013. Hu SL. Experimental study on the evaluation of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer after chemotherapy and radiotherapy with 18F-ML-10 PET/CT[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2013. |
[39] |
Reshef A, Shirvan A, Waterhouse RN, et al.
Molecular Imaging of Neurovascular Cell Death in Experimental Cerebral Stroke by PET[J]. J Nucl MedJ Nucl Med, 2008, 49(9): 1520-1528.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043919 |
[40] |
Allen AM, Ben-Ami M, Reshef A, et al.
Assessment of response of brain metastases to radiotherapy by PET imaging of apoptosis with 18F-ML-10[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol ImagingEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2012, 39(9): 1400-1408.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2150-8 |
[41] |
Sun L, Zhou KD, Wang WJ, et al.
[18F]ML-10 Imaging for Assessment of Apoptosis Response of Intracranial Tumor Early after Radiosurgery by PET/CT[J]. Contrast Media Mol ImagingContrast Media Mol Imaging, 2018, 2018: 9365174-.
doi: 10.1155/2018/9365174 |