[1]

Ferrari C, Niccoli AA, Merenda N, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Predictive value of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in therapy response assessment[J/OL]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(5): e5973[2018-01-07]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28151888. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005973.

[2] Agrawal K, Mittal BR, Bansal D, et al. Role of 18F FDG PET/CT in assessing bone marrow involvement in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2013, 27(2):146-151. DOI:10.1007/s12149-012-0665-5.
[3] Chung EM, Pavio M. Pediatric Extranodal Lymphoma[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2016, 54(4):727-746. DOI:10.1016/j.rcl.2016.03. 004.
[4] Uslu L, Donig J, Link M, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric malignancies[J]. J Nucl Med, 2015, 56(2):274-286. DOI:10.2967/jnumed.114.146290.
[5] Rosolen A, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, et al. Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(18):2112-2118. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7203.
[6] Weiler-Sagie M, Bushelev O, Epelbaum R, et al. 18F-FDG avidity in lymphoma readdressed:a study of 766 patients[J]. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51(1):25-30. DOI:10.2967/jnumed.109.067892.
[7] Bakhshi S, Radhakrishnan V, Sharma P, et al. Pediatric nonlymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma:baseline, interim, and posttreatment PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation——a prospective study[J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(3):956-968. DOI:10.1148/radiol.11110936.
[8] Kabickova E, Sumerauer D, Cumlivska E, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and standard procedures for the pretreatment staging of children and adolescents with Hodgkin's disease[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2006, 33(9):1025-1031. DOI:10.1007/s00259-005-0019-9.
[9] Uslu L, Donig J, Link M, et al. Value of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric malignancies[J]. J Nucl Med, 2015, 56(2):274-286. DOI:10.2967/jnumed.114.146290.
[10] Bakhshi S, Bhethanabhotla S, Kumar R, et al. Posttreatment PET/CT rather than interim PET/CT using Deauville Criteria predicts outcome in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma:a prospective study comparing PET/CT with conventionalImaging[J]. J Nucl Med, 2017, 58(4):577-583. DOI:10.2967/jnummed.116.176511.
[11] Paulino AC, Margolin J, Dreyer Z, et al. Impact of PET-CT on involved field radiotherapy design for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2012, 58(6):860-864. DOI:10.1002/pbc.23273.
[12]

Zapata CP, Cuglievan B, Zapata CM, et al. PET/CT versus bone marrow biopsy in the initial evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in various pediatric malignancies[J/OL]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2018, 65(2)[2018-01-07]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28901637. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26814.

[13] Hassan A, Siddique M, Bashir H, et al. 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging versus bone marrow biopsy in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma:a quantitative assessment of marrow uptake and novel insights into clinical implications of marrow involvement[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2017, 44(7):1198-1206. DOI:10.1007/s00259-017-3647-y.
[14] Kluge R, Kurch L, Montravers F, et al. FDG PET/CT in children and adolescents with lymphoma[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2013, 43(4):406-417. DOI:10.1007/s00247-012-2559-z.
[15] Cheng G, Chen W, Chamroonrat W, et al. Biopsy versus FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation of bone marrow involvement in pediatric lymphoma patients[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2011, 38(8):1469-1476. DOI:10.1007/s00259-011-1815-z.
[16] Purz S, Mauz-Körholz C, Körholz D, et al.[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of bone marrow involvement in children and adolescents with Hodgkin's lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(26):3523-3528. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4996.
[17] Kluge R, Körholz D. Role of FDG-PET in Staging and Therapy of Children with Hodgkin Lymphoma[J]. Klin Padiatr, 2011, 223(6):315-319. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1287834.
[18] Cheng G, Servaes S, Zhuang H. Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan versus diagnostic contrast computed tomography in initial staging of pediatric patients with lymphoma[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2013, 54(4):737-742. DOI:10.3109/10428194.2012.727416.
[19] Kiratli PÖ, Tuncel M, Bar-Sever Z. Nuclear Medicine in Pediatric and Adolescent Tumors[J]. Semin Nucl Med, 2016, 6(4):308-323. DOI:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.004.
[20] Seth R, Puri K, Singh P, et al. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography in resolving therapeutic dilemmas in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Indian J Nucl Med, 2012, 27(3):141-144. DOI:10.4103/0972-3919.112717.
[21] Riad R, Omar W, Kotb M, et al. Role of PET/CT in malignant pediatric lymphoma[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010, 37(2):319-329. DOI:10.1007/s00259-009-1276-9.
[22]

Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors[J]. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50 Suppl 1: S122-150. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.

[23] Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(5):579-586. DOI:10.1200/JCO. 2006.09.2403.
[24] 覃春霞, 兰晓莉. PET/CT在恶性淋巴瘤疗效评估中的应用[J].临床内科杂志, 2015, 32(3):166-169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2015.03.006.
Qin CX, Lan XL. Application of PET/CT in the evaluation of malignant lymphoma[J]. J Clin Intern Med, 2015, 32(3):166-169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2015.03.006.
[25]

Bailly C, Eugène T, Couec ML, et al. Prognostic Value and Clinical Impact of 18FDG-PET in the Management of Children with Burkitt Lymphoma after Induction Chemotherapy[J/OL]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2014, 1: 54[2018-01-06]. https//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292173. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00054.

[26] Ilivitzki A, Radan L, Ben-Arush M, et al. Early interim FDG PET/CT prediction of treatment response and prognosis in pediatric Hodgkin disease-added value of low-dose CT[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2013, 43(1):86-92. DOI:10.1007/s00247-012-2517-9.
[27] Depas G, De Barsy C, Jerusalem G, et al. 18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2005, 32(1):31-38. DOI:10.1007/s00259-004-1604-z.
[28] Furth C, Steffen IG, Erdrich AS, et al. Explorative analyses on the value of interim PET for prediction of response in pediatric and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients[J]. EJNMMI Res, 2013, 3(1):71. DOI:10.1186/2191-219X-3-71.
[29] Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, et al. FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Blood, 2006, 107(1):52-59. DOI:10.1182/blood -2005-06-2252.
[30] Bhojwani D, McCarville MB, Choi JK, et al. The role of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of residual disease in paediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Br J Haematol, 2015, 168(6):845-853. DOI:10.1111/bjh.13219.
[31] Furth C, Steffen IG, Amthauer H, e t al. Early and late therapy response assessment with[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma:analysis of a prospective multicenter trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(26):4385-4391. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7814.
[32] Levine JM, Weiner M, Kelly KM. Routine use of PET scans after completion of therapy in pediatric Hodgkin disease results in a high false positive rate[J]. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2006, 28(11):711-714. DOI:10.1097/01.mph.0000243648.66734.eb.
[33] Meany HJ, Gidvani VK, Minniti CP. Utility of PET scans to predict disease relapse in pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2007, 48(4):399-402. DOI:10.1002/pbc.20797.
[34] Longo DL. Treatment of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma:the more things change, the more they stay the same[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(6):660-662. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2012.44.7235.
[35] Nievelstein RA, van Ufford HM Q, Kwee TC, et al. Radiation exposure and mortality risk from CT and PET imaging of patients with malignant lymphoma[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(9):1946-1954. DOI:10.1007/s00330-012-2447-9.
[36] Voss SD, Chen L, Constine LS, et al. Surveillance computed tomography imaging and detection of relapse in intermediate- and advanced-stage pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma:a report from the Children's Oncology Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(21):2635-2640. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.7841.
[37] Rathore N, Eissa HM, Margolin JF, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma:are we over-scanning our patients[J]. Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2012, 29(5):415-423. DOI:10.3109/08880018.2012.684198.
[38] Eissa HM, Allen CE, Kamdar K, et al. Pediatric Burkitt's lymphoma and diffuse B-cell lymphoma:are surveillance scans required[J]. Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2014, 31(3):253-257. DOI:10.3109/08880018.2013.834400.
[39] Voss SD. Surveillance imaging in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma[J]. Curr Hematol Malig Rep, 2013, 8(3):218-225. DOI:10.1007/s11899-013-0168-z.
[40] Nievelstein RA, van Ufford HM Q, Kwee TC, et al. Radiation exposure and mortality risk from CT and PET imaging of patients with malignant lymphoma[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(9):1946-1954. DOI:10.1007/s00330-012-2447-9.
[41] Abdel RH, Sedky M, Hamoda A, et al. Role of FDG-PET scan in the management of pediatric mature B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CCHE experience[J]. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst, 2016, 28(2):95-99. DOI:10.1016/j.jnci.2016.03.003.
[42] Juweid ME. FDG-PET/CT in lymphoma[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2011, 727:1-19. DOI:10.1007/978-1-61779-062-1_1.
[43] Schäfer JF, Gatidis S, Schmidt H, et al. Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology:initial results[J]. Radiology, 2014, 273(1):220-231. DOI:10.1148/radiol.14131732.
[44] Daldrup-Link H. How PET/MR Can Add Value For Children With Cancer[J]. Curr Radiol Rep, 2017, 5(3):15. DOI:10.1007/s40134-017-0207-y.