[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.   doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
[2] Kumar S, Metz DC, Ellenberg S, et al.  Risk factors and incidence of gastric cancer after detection of Helicobacter pylori infection: a large cohort study[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(3): 527-536.   doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.019
[3] Koga H, Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, et al.  An analysis of the physiological FDG uptake pattern in the stomach[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2003, 17(8): 733-738.   doi: 10.1007/BF02984984
[4]

Farghaly H, Alshareef M, Alqarni A, et al. Dual time point [18F]Flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) /computed tomography (CT) with water gastric distension in differentiation between malignant and benign gastric lesions[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol Open, 2020, 7: 100268[2020-10-01]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490534. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100268.

[5] Takahashi H, Ukawa K, Ohkawa N, et al.  Significance of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose accumulation in the stomach on positron emission tomography[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2009, 23(4): 391-397.   doi: 10.1007/s12149-009-0255-3
[6] 王欣, 于丽娟, 陆佩欧, 等.  临床隐匿性胃癌的FDG PET/CT征象[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2012, 20(36): 3695-3700.   doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v20.i36.3695
Wang X, Yu LJ, Lu PO, et al.  FDG PET/CT diagnosis of clinically occult gastric cancer[J]. World Chin J Digestol, 2012, 20(36): 3695-3700.   doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v20.i36.3695
[7] Kamimura K, Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, et al.  Role of gastric distention with additional water in differentiating locally advanced gastric carcinomas from physiological uptake in the stomach on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2009, 30(6): 431-439.   doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283299a2f
[8] Zhu ZH, Li F, Mao YL, et al.  Improving evaluation of primary gastric malignancies by distending the stomach with milk immediately before 18F-FDG PET scanning[J]. J Nucl Med Technol, 2008, 36(1): 25-29.   doi: 10.2967/jnmt.107.044081
[9] Yoon JK, Byun C, Jo KS, et al.  Clinicopathologic parameters associated with the FDG-avidity in staging of early gastric cancer using 18F-FDG PET[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(31): e16690-.   doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016690
[10] Chung HW, Kim JH, Sung IK, et al.  FDG PET/CT to predict the curability of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2019, 145(3): 759-764.   doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-02832-9
[11] Shimada H, Okazumi S, Koyama M, et al.  Japanese gastric cancer association task force for research promotion: clinical utility of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(1): 13-21.   doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0017-5
[12] Chon HJ, Kim C, Cho A, et al.  The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2019, 22(1): 113-122.   doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0847-5
[13] Findlay JM, Antonowicz S, Segaran A, et al.  Routinely staging gastric cancer with 18F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(5): 2490-2498.   doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5904-2
[14] Coupe NA, Karikios D, Chong S, et al.  Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer[J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2014, 28(2): 128-135.   doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0791-8
[15] Kawamura T, Kusakabe T, Sugino T, et al.  Expression of glucose transporter-1 in human gastric carcinoma: association with tumor aggressiveness, metastasis, and patient survival[J]. Cancer, 2001, 92(3): 634-641.   doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<634::aid-cncr1364>3.0.co;2-x
[16] Alakus H, Batur M, Schmidt M, et al.  Variable 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in gastric cancer is associated with different levels of GLUT-1 expression[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2010, 31(6): 532-538.   doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32833823ac
[17] Lim JY, Yoon SO, Seol SY, et al.  Overexpression of the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase is an adverse prognostic factor for signet ring cell gastric cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(30): 4037-4043.   doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4037
[18] Lehmann K, Eshmuminov D, Bauerfeind P, et al.  18FDG-PET-CT improves specificity of preoperative lymph-node staging in patients with intestinal but not diffuse-type esophagogastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43(1): 196-202.   doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.020
[19] Kim SK, Kang KW, Lee JS, et al.  Assessment of lymph node metastases using 18F-FDG PET in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2006, 33(2): 148-155.   doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1887-8
[20] Kim EY, Lee WJ, Choi D, et al.  The value of PET/CT for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2011, 79(2): 183-188.   doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.005
[21] Tang L, Wang XL, Baba H, et al.  Gastric cancer and image-derived quantitative parameters: part 2— a critical review of DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(1): 247-260.   doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06370-x
[22] Song BI, Kim HW, Won KS, et al.  Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(26): e1037-.   doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001037
[23]

Wang X, Wei YZ, Xue YW, et al. Predictive role of the number of 18F-FDG-positive lymph nodes detected by PET/CT for pre-treatment evaluation of locally advanced gastric cancer[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(12): e0166836[2019-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27936109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166836.

[24] Kwon HW, An L, Kwon HR, et al.  Preoperative nodal 18F-FDG avidity rather than primary tumor avidity determines the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2018, 18(3): 218-229.   doi: 10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e23
[25] Chen J, Cheong JH, Yun MJ, et al.  Improvement in preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma with positron emission tomography[J]. Cancer, 2005, 103(11): 2383-2390.   doi: 10.1002/cncr.21074
[26] Kawanaka Y, Kitajima K, Fukushima K, et al.  Added value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(5): 989-995.   doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.003
[27] Serrano OK, Love C, Goldman I, et al.  The value of FDG-PET in the staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: a single institution retrospective review[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2016, 113(6): 640-646.   doi: 10.1002/jso.24190
[28] Bosch KD, Chicklore S, Cook GJ, et al.  Staging FDG PET-CT changes management in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who are eligible for radical treatment[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2020, 47(4): 759-767.   doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04429-x
[29] Smyth E, Schöder H, Strong VE, et al.  A prospective evaluation of the utility of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in staging locally advanced gastric cancer[J]. Cancer, 2012, 118(22): 5481-5488.   doi: 10.1002/cncr.27550