[1] Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Eisner K, et al. Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization:Planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET[J]. J Nucl Med, 1999, 40(10):1623-1629.
[2] Hawkins RA, Choi Y, Huang SC, et al. Evaluation of the skeletal kinetics of fluorine-18-fluoride ion with PET[J]. J Nucl Med, 1992,33(5):633-642.
[3] Brenner W, Vernon C, Muzi M, et al. Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(9):1493-1500.
[4] Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Flusser G, et al. Assessment of malignant skeletal disease:initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(2):272-278.
[5] Lonneux M, Borbath Ⅱ, Berliere M, et al. The place of whole-body PET FDG for the diagnosis of distant recurrence of breast cancer[J]. Clin Positron Imaging, 2000, 3(2):45-49.
[6] Gallowitsch HJ, Kresnik E, Gasser J, et al. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma:A comparison to conventional imaging[J]. Invest Radiol, 2003, 38(5):250-256.
[7] Gayed I, Vu T, Johnson M, et al. Comparison of bone and 2-deoxy2-[18F]fiuoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of bony metastases in lung cancer[J]. Mol Imaging Biol, 2003,5(1):26-31.
[8] Uematsu T, Yuen S, Yukisawa S, et al. Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(4):1266-1273.
[9] Morris MJ, Akhurst T, Osman I, et al. Fluorinated deoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in progressive metastatic prostate cancer[J]. Urology, 2002, 59(6):913-918.
[10] Israel O, Militianu D, Goldberg A, et al. PET-CT assessment of bone metastases-FDG avidity and CT patterns before and after treatment[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45:79P.
[11] Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A, et al. Malignant involvement of the spine:Assessment by 18F-FDG PET-CT[J]. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45(2):279-284.