DECT能谱曲线斜率联合CT值对早期肺腺癌浸润性的评估价值

Evaluation value of DECT energy spectrum curve slope combined with CT value on invasion of early lung adenocarcinoma

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨双能量CT(DECT)能谱曲线斜率(λHU)联合CT值对早期肺腺癌浸润性的评估价值。
    方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究,回顾性分析2024年1月至2025年10月在陕西省人民医院收治、术前均行胸部DECT平扫联合增强扫描且经术后组织病理学检查确诊为Ⅰ期早期肺腺癌的90例患者男性44例、女性46例,年龄(57.9±11.5)岁,范围34~84岁的临床和DECT影像资料。测量并记录病灶DECT的定量参数病灶部位、病灶最大径、平扫CT值,动脉期及静脉期的λHU、碘浓度(IC)、有效原子序数(Zeff)、标准化碘浓度(NIC)。根据组织病理学检查结果将患者分为原位腺癌(AIS)组(n=19)、微浸润腺癌(MIA)组(n=25)、浸润性腺癌(IAC)组(n=46),比较三组间各参数的差异,然后将AIS与MIA患者合并为非IAC组(n=44),与IAC组(n=46)进行比较。非IAC组与IAC组间比较采用独立样本t检验;多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,组间两两比较采用SNK-q检验。非IAC组与IAC组间差异比较采用χ2检验。将单因素分析差异有统计学意义的参数纳入共线性诊断,通过方差膨胀因子(VIF)评价变量共线性程度,以VIF>10判定存在严重共线性并予以剔除。将无共线性的指标纳入多因素logistic回归分析,筛选鉴别早期肺癌IAC的独立预测危险因素。采用ROC曲线评价各参数及联合预测模型预测IAC的诊断效能;采用DeLong检验评价各因素及联合预测模型的诊断效能差异。
    结果 AIS、MIA、IAC三组间病灶部位差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.226,P=0.893);而病灶长径、平扫CT值、动脉期及静脉期的λHU、Zeff、IC、NIC差异均有统计学意义(F=20.929~95.373,均P<0.001)。IAC组与非IAC组间病灶部位差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.206,P=0.650),病灶最大径、平扫CT值、动脉期及静脉期的λHU、IC、Zeff、NIC差异均有统计学意义(t=3.731~13.384,均P<0.001)。单因素logistic回归分析结果显示上述影像参数均与IAC发病相关(均P<0.05),经共线性诊断剔除静脉期λHU、动静脉期IC、NIC、Zeff后,经多因素logistic回归分析筛选出病灶最大径、平扫CT值、动脉期λHU为IAC独立预测因子(均P<0.05);ROC曲线分析结果显示,平扫CT值、动脉期λHU的AUC分别为0.857、0.932,二者构建的联合预测模型预测IAC的AUC为0.966(灵敏度91.30%、特异度90.91%),联合预测模型的整体诊断效能显著优于单一影像参数(Z=3.082、2.208,均P<0.05)。
    结论 早期肺腺癌患者术前接受DECT扫描有助于判断浸润性,平扫CT值、动脉期λHU是预测IAC的有效指标,二者联合评估可以显著提高术前诊断的准确率。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the value of combining dual-energy CT (DECT) energy spectrum curve slope with CT value on evaluating the invasion of early lung cancer.
    Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to retrospectively analyze the clinical data and DECT imaging data of 90 patients (44 males and 46 females, aged 34-84 years, with an average of 57.89±11.52 years) who underwent chest DECT plain scan combined with enhanced scan before surgery and were diagnosed as stage I early lung adenocarcinoma by postoperative histopathological examination in Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2024 and October 2025. The lesion DECT quantitative parameters lesion location, maximum diameter, plain scan CT value, slope of energy spectrum curve (λHU), iodine concentration (IC) and effective atomic number (Zeff) and normalized iodine concentration (NIC) in arterial and venous phases were measured and recorded. According to the histopathological examination results, the patients were classified into adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) group (n=19), microinvasive carcinoma (MIA) group (n=25) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) group (n=46). The differences in parameters among the three groups were compared. AIS patients and MIA patients were combined into the non-IAC group (n=44) and were compared with the IAC group (n=46). Independent-samples t test (homogeneity of variance) was used for comparison between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance was applied for comparison among multiple groups, and SNK-q test was utilized for pairwise comparison between groups. The difference between the non-IAC group and the IAC group was compared by chi-square test. The parameters with statistically significant differences in univariate analysis were included in the collinearity diagnosis, and the degree of collinearity of the variables was evaluated by variance inflation factor (VIF). Variables with VIF>10 were determined with significant collinearity and were eliminated. Non-collinearity indicators were incorporated into multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen independent predictive risk factors for identifying early IAC. ROC curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of each parameter and combined prediction model on predicting IAC. DeLong test evaluated the differences in the diagnostic efficiency of each factor and combined prediction model.
    Results There were no statistical difference in lesion location among the three groups (χ2=0.226, P=0.893), while the differences in maximum lesion diameter, CT value of plain scan as well as λHU, Zeff, IC and NIC in arterial phase and venous phase were statistically significant (F=95.373, 34.588, 50.293, 52.073, 20.929, 32.192, 55.745, 52.656, 61.093, 54.569, all P<0.001). No statistical difference was found in lesion location between the IAC group and the non-IAC group (χ2=0.206, P=0.650), while there were statistical differences in the maximum lesion diameter, plain scan CT value and arterial phase and venous phase λHU, IC, Zeff and NIC (t=13.384, 6.578, 11.068, 9.462, 3.731, 6.277, 8.926, 9.180, 9.416, 8.998, all P<0.001). Univariate analysis results revealed that the above parameters were all associated with IAC (all P<0.05). After excluding λHU in venous phase and IC, NIC and Zeff in arterial phase and venous phase by collinearity diagnosis, multivariate logistic regression identified maximum lesion diameter, plain scan CT value and arterial phase λHU as independent predictors for IAC (all P<0.05). ROC curve analysis results indicated that the AUCs of maximum lesion diameter and plain scan CT value were 0.857 and 0.932 respectively, and the AUC of the combined prediction model was 0.966, with a sensitivity of 91.30% and a specificity of 90.91%. The predictive efficiency of the combined model was significantly superior to that of any single parameter.
    Conclusion Preoperative DECT scan is helpful to judge the invasion of patients with early lung cancer. Plain scan CT value and arterial phase λHU are effective parameters for predicting IAC. The combined evaluation of the two parameters can significantly enhance the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis.

     

/

返回文章
返回