基于放射调控的细胞周期相关基因的前列腺癌预后模型

Prognostic model for prostate cancer based on radiation-regulated cell cycle-related genes

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨放射调控的细胞周期相关特征基因在前列腺癌(PCa)预测中的价值并构建相关预后模型。
    方法 采用10×Genomics Chromium平台,对分别以0、0.5、2、8 Gy 137Cs γ射线(剂量率为0.883 Gy/min)进行单剂量照射的PCa细胞系LNCaP和PC3(0 Gy为对照组)进行单细胞RNA测序及基因富集分析。此外,基于癌症基因组图谱-PCa数据集(TCGA-PRAD),应用非负矩阵分解(NMF)聚类算法进行分子分型。随后以最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)-Cox回归分析构建PCa放射敏感型细胞周期预后模型,根据TCGA-PRAD中风险评分的中位阈值将患者分为低风险组(n=218)和高风险组(n=217),并通过Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和时间依赖性受试者工作特征曲线评估该模型对TCGA-PRAD无生化复发生存期的预测效能。使用独立外部验证集纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)-PCa数据集对最终模型进行验证,计算相同性能指标,检验模型在临床应用中的泛化能力。采用单样本基因集富集分析算法对TCGA-PRAD中的肿瘤样本进行系统性免疫功能与免疫细胞浸润分析。最终,应用oncoPredict计算药物对高风险和低风险肿瘤的半数抑制浓度以筛选风险特异性敏感药物,系统解析PCa放射调控的分子机制及治疗靶点。组间比较采用配对样本t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验。
    结果 单细胞RNA测序结果显示,8 Gy γ 射线照射后LNCaP细胞系呈现出多簇分布并富集细胞周期、细胞周期过程调控、S期及G2/M 期转换等核心细胞周期相关通路(均P<0.01),而PC3细胞系周期反应微弱,表现出更强的放射耐受能力。整合TCGA-PRAD中肿瘤与正常组织差异表达基因、放射调控基因和细胞周期相关基因后,共获得68个交集基因,其中63个基因的风险比>1。根据68个交集基因对TCGA-PRAD进行一致性聚类,通过NMF聚类算法鉴定出2簇肿瘤亚型。LASSO-Cox回归分析构建了包含7个核心基因额外纺锤体极体样蛋白1、细胞分裂周期相关蛋白5、Polo样激酶1、极光激酶B、叉头框蛋白M1、驱动蛋白家族成员(KIF)18B、KIF2C的PCa预后模型,该模型风险评分预测患者3年无生化复发生存期的曲线下面积(AUC)达0.691,其预测性能优于Gleason评分和M、N分期常规指标(AUC分别为0.661、0.511、0.527)。经MSKCC-PCa外部验证集验证,该模型的稳定性与泛化能力良好(患者3年无生化复发生存期AUC为0.723),且单细胞RNA测序结果证实,137Cs γ射线可下调高风险预后基因表达(t=2.20~30.88,均P<0.001)。免疫细胞浸润分析结果显示,高风险组免疫检查点阻断治疗获益有限,同时oncoPredict计算预测高风险肿瘤样本对蛋白激酶B/Wnt信号通路更敏感(均P<0.001),该预后模型可作为整合放疗、免疫与靶向治疗的决策依据。
    结论 放射调控的细胞周期相关PCa预后模型可预测PCa细胞的周期增殖活性,为联合放疗−免疫−靶向的个体化干预提供潜在的决策依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the predictive value of radiation-regulated cell cycle-related signature genes in prostate cancer (PCa) and to develop a corresponding prognostic model.
    Methods Single-cell RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis were performed on PCa cell lines LNCaP and PC3 with the 10×Genomics Chromium platform. Cells were exposed to single-dose irradiation with 137Cs γ-rays at a dose rate of 0.883 Gy/min. The administered doses were 0, 0.5, 2, and 8 Gy (0 Gy served as the control group). In addition, molecular subtyping was conducted using a nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering algorithm based on The Cancer Genome Atlas-prostate adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD). Subsequently, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression model was used in the construction of a cell cycle-related prognostic model for radiation-sensitive PCa. Patients were assigned to low-risk (n=218) and high-risk (n=217) groups according to the median threshold of risk scores in TCGA-PRAD. The predictive efficacy of the model for biochemical recurrence-free survival in TCGA-PRAD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves. The final model was validated using an independent external validation dataset from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)-PCa cohort, and identical performance metrics were calculated to test the model's generalizability in clinical practice. Immune function and immune cell infiltration in tumor samples from TCGA-PRAD were systematically assessed through single-sample gene set enrichment analysis. Finally, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration of drugs in high-risk and low-risk tumors was calculated using oncoPredict for the identification of risk-specific sensitive drugs, and the molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets of radiation regulation in PCa were further explored. Paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for between-group comparisons.
    Results Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that the LNCaP cell lines exhibited multicluster distribution after 8 Gy 137Cs γ-ray irradiation, and notable enrichment was observed in core cell cycle-related pathways, including cell cycle, regulation of cell cycle process, and S and G2/M phase transition (all P<0.01). By contrast, PC3 cell lines showed a weak cell cycle response but stronger radioresistance. After the integration of differentially expressed genes in tumor and normal tissues, radiation-regulated genes, and cell cycle-related genes from TCGA-PRAD, a total of 68 intersecting genes were obtained, of which 63 genes had a hazard ratio>1. Consensus clustering of TCGA-PRAD was performed using the 68 intersecting genes, and two tumor subtypes were identified by the NMF clustering algorithm. LASSO-Cox regression analysis established a PCa prognostic model consisting of seven core genes (extra spindlepole bodies like 1, cell division cycle associated 5, Polo-like kinase 1, aurora kinase B, forkhead box M1, kinesin family member (KIF) 18B, and KIF2C). The area under the curve (AUC) of the risk score for predicting 3 year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 0.691, which outperformed conventional indicators, including the Gleason score (AUC=0.661), M stage (AUC=0.511), and N stage (AUC=0.527). Validation in the MSKCC-PCa external dataset confirmed the favorable stability and generalizability of the model (AUC=0.723 for 3 year biochemical recurrence-free survival). Single-cell RNA sequencing further verified that 137Cs γ-rays downregulated the expression of high-risk prognostic genes (t=2.20–30.88, all P<0.001). Immune cell infiltration analysis indicated limited benefit from immune checkpoint blockade therapy in the high-risk group. Meanwhile, oncoPredict prediction demonstrated that high-risk tumor samples were more sensitive to inhibitors targeting the protein kinase B/Wnt signaling pathways (all P<0.001). This prognostic model can serve as a basis for decision-making in integrating radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.
    Conclusion The PCa prognostic model based on the radiation-regulated cell cycle can predict the proliferative activity of PCa cells, providing a potential decision-making for individualized interventions combining radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

     

/

返回文章
返回